Thread

Turn off Apple Intelligence on macOS 27 and get its disk space back

491 points · 308 comments · privacyisntdead

Loading the complete thread in the background. This saved snapshot is available now. Refresh

arialdomartini · 1791145038 · focus · HN ↗
Stop the curl | bash insanity.
<a href="https://nocurlbash.com/#en" rel="nofollow">https://nocurlbash.com/#en
1. demibabs · 1791145138 · focus · HN ↗
  Good message but AI generated text is so grating to read.
2. shujito · 1791145161 · focus · HN ↗
  there's a homebrew alternative
  1. stock_toaster · 1791148110 · focus · HN ↗
    [delayed]
3. 1over137 · 1791145522 · focus · HN ↗
  “You wouldn't run a stranger's code without reading it.” Yes I would. We all do it all the time. macOS itself is closed source, and even if it weren't, there’s way too much code to read.
  1. jtrueb · 1791145774 · focus · HN ↗
    Lol, thinking the exact same thing. No, we don’t read next to 0.0001% of the code we run.
    jacquesm · 1791147149 · focus · HN ↗
    Code from trusted repositories is an entirely different thing compared to running 'wget some_github_repo_shell_script | sh' . That said, the likes of Tailscale are setting a bad example.
    nvme0n1p1 · 1791148360 · focus · HN ↗
    The script, and the code the script downloads, both come from the same repo and were written by the same developer.
    If you've already decided you trust the author, what's the actual threat here?
    jacquesm · 1791148539 · focus · HN ↗
    I would not trust the author just like that.
    But then again, I'm a bit paranoid. At a minimum I would download the script and read it, and if it was too long or not written clearly enough then I would just drop it and find something better.
    user43928 · 1791148905 · focus · HN ↗
    I think the point is that when a repo contains:
    program.bin install.sh
    It seems rather pointless for me to thoroughly inspect the install script before I run the program.
    halJordan · 1791148680 · focus · HN ↗
    You download a dmg and run it blindly? You download an exe and run it blindly. I wish it were in an rpm or deb coming from signed repos, but it's not so here we are
    kbolino · 1791149368 · focus · HN ↗
    App bundles (what's inside most DMGs) and Windows executables are signed, have been for a long time, and are required to be, by the O/S, in order to execute "normally". Apple uses centralized PKI (the developer's key must be signed by Apple) while Microsoft uses distributed PKI (the developer's key must be signed by a code-signing CA who in turn is approved by Microsoft).
    Rohansi · 1791150924 · focus · HN ↗
    [dead]
  2. tmpz22 · 1791145958 · focus · HN ↗
    Don’t be obtuse, the intended audience is developers with enterprise credentials sprinkled throughout their environment.
    Its a different threat model. You should not curl bash.
    benterix · 1791147833 · focus · HN ↗
    Developers with enterprise credentials sprinkled throughout their environment running anything from the Internet deserve what they get.
    But I assumed the intended audience are home users with entry level macbooks/minis with 128 GB RAM where this patch actually helps them.
4. aaomidi · 1791146221 · focus · HN ↗
  This isn’t really that much of an issue when we have tls tbh.
  Like I get why it’s bad, but also homebrew package installation is a more organized version of this.
  Hashes are cool but also in a lot of systems you’re trusting the hash to be provided by the same website you don’t trust the binaries from…
5. [deleted] · 1791146272 · focus · HN ↗
  [deleted]
6. packeted · 1791146306 · focus · HN ↗
  Great initiative. I recently got stung by an advert on reddit for "HBO Max for MacOS, 6 months free" from the official HBO user (don't get me started on how that slipped through). Front and center was a curl | bash copy to clipboard that obfuscated the payload source in base10. I knew better, but I think we've made this kind of thing way too acceptable. Of course it was malware and I realized the instant I pressed enter. Thankfully I didn't give it my password and immediately disconnected from the internet and killed the machine. I'm genuinely concerned these kind of attacks are going to become much more commonplace with AI, plus the ability to inject malicious code in to things that get run by trusted scripted installers.
  1. swozey · 1791146443 · focus · HN ↗
    They all dump env and ship it off so check for any keys you might have had in there if anything was able to send at all.
  2. andelink · 1791147374 · focus · HN ↗
    You curled and executed bash code allegedly from _HBO_?
    scuppernong · 1791155044 · focus · HN ↗
    yeah i don't mean to victim blame here but you thought HBO on reddit wanted you to paste something into your terminal?
  3. Dylan16807 · 1791160263 · focus · HN ↗
    It's easier to walk someone through a single command than adding a software repository, so it's a risk factor for someone that isn't paying attention or doesn't know what they're doing.
    But if you're in the state of mind to consider the security nuances of curl|bash verses other install methods, you're already past the "should I be installing this?" question and the complaints on this page won't save you.
7. hypeatei · 1791146352 · focus · HN ↗
  > If the project publishes a SHA-256 hash, use it. Non-negotiable on production machines.
  They're pushing FUD around downloading a file but then suggest that we trust the same chain of complex things to display the right hash value? Integrity != authentication.
8. mogwire · 1791146353 · focus · HN ↗
  I bet this is the guy on the call who has to correct someone who calls them SSL certs.
  Excuse me, they are TLS certs.
  Thanks Arialdomartini, as I was saying… we need to renew the SSL Certs
  1. not_a_bot_4sho · 1791151922 · focus · HN ↗
    > I bet this is the guy on the call who has to correct someone who calls them SSL certs.
    "Did you know there's no pumpkin in pumpkin spice?"
    "Next you're going to tell me what's not in baby powder, aren't you?"
9. maccard · 1791146436 · focus · HN ↗
  What’s your suggested installation method instead? Unless it’s “download and read the source before running it” this is no worse than npm install, or pip install, or clicking “trust” on a git repo in VSCode
  1. mingus88 · 1791146998 · focus · HN ↗
    It is actually worse than those examples. Pip and npm may be insecure, and that is a fault of those tools, but most user expect secure package managers and should demand it
    Telling users it’s fine to raw dog arbitrary commands directly into their shell is dangerous and lowers the bar for all security. In fact by even making this comparison you are communicating that you are complacent with pip and npm’s issues and why shouldn’t you just execute arbitrary commands without even a second glance? Security doesn’t matter!
    And for the record, even with pip and npm being the way that they are, they are still better than a curl pipe because they are versioned. In the case I get a compromised deployment I understand immediately if I got hit by the affected package, and the entire repo can then be audited. Not the case when I’m just curling whatever the internet wants to send into my process space
  2. zakki · 1791147594 · focus · HN ↗
    Fed the source to LLM for analysis?
  3. stock_toaster · 1791147988 · focus · HN ↗
    [delayed]
10. porridgeraisin · 1791147047 · focus · HN ↗
  > Bash starts before the download finishes ... Drop the connection mid-transfer and you get partial execution: a command like rm -r /usr/share/program can truncate to rm -r /usr. Commands ran, cleanup didn’t.
  curl | bash scripts all define a function and then call it on the last line. This is a non issue in the real world.
  > The server knows you’re piping — and can lie
  This `sleep` based trick is always a cool demo to show freinds yes, but the server can also sneak in malware in a multitude of other ways given you're downloading code and binaries from them.
  > You trust DNS, TLS, the CDN, and the origin simultaneously. A compromised CDN or BGP hijack delivers malware silently.
  Well yes, that's how the internet works. If TLS of the server is really compromised, then the attacker will replace the checksum as well as the signing key. In real scenarios, you are going to be reading the signing key and checksum from the same domain. [1]
  > You can’t reproduce what ran
  `| tee inspect.sh | bash`
  > Add sudo and it’s game over
  Most credentials and important files live in the home directory, root is a red herring. If you're running it on shared server, then well... don't add sudo.
  [1] Yes of course there are legitimate usecases for signing software. Common example: linux distros which are mirrored at many domains, but the checksum and signature are hosted on the canonical domain. But if I am curlbashing uv's install.sh from `astral.sh`, then doing signature verification using the public key hosted on the same astral.sh isn't adding much.
  1. hnfong · 1791148070 · focus · HN ↗
    > curl | bash scripts all define a function and then call it on the last line. This is a non issue in the real world.
    Please take a look at this before making any assertions... <a href="https://github.com/omlahore/RemoveMacAI/blob/main/install.sh" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/omlahore/RemoveMacAI/blob/main/install.sh
    porridgeraisin · 1791150055 · focus · HN ↗
    Hey thats not the worst curlbash script i've seen
  2. Terr_ · 1791148167 · focus · HN ↗
    I think that's missing the forest for trees. The problem with these curl-to-bash approaches is not that you are literally unable to intercept and inspect them.
    The problem is that:
    1. The effort and care needed to test is unnecessarily high. You've got to guard against way more tricks from an interactive source.
    2. With no "standard" artifact that can be exactly compared, that work cannot be shared.
    In contrast, release_1.2.3.zip isn't going to mutate under you and everybody can agree on what its size/hash/bytes ought to be, and if it deviates from that it sets off alarm-bells.
    > curl | bash scripts all define a function and then call it on the last line. This is a non issue in the real world.
    Why would a convention often followed by good/careful actors bind what malicious/careless people create?
    porridgeraisin · 1791150137 · focus · HN ↗
    Well, if you're running software from someone you think can deliver malware to you (and not a middleman) then it's a lost cause anyways no? I don't see what the zip file adds. It's not like you're gonna be inspecting the code or binaries.
    Terr_ · 1791170766 · focus · HN ↗
    [delayed]
  3. alienbaby · 1791151383 · focus · HN ↗
    `| tee inspect.sh | bash`
    Isn't that a bit like shutting the stable door after the horse has bolted?
    porridgeraisin · 1791153023 · focus · HN ↗
    That's what they wanted to do
    >> reproduce what ran
11. anonymzz · 1791149957 · focus · HN ↗
  curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/omlahore/RemoveMacAI/main/install.sh | pi -p 'Security-audit this shell script; output the script unchanged ONLY if safe to execute, otherwise output nothing and explain findings to stderr' | bash
  1. nunez · 1791157449 · focus · HN ↗
    there's no way to guarantee that the model won't change the script after processing it...
    Dylan16807 · 1791160707 · focus · HN ↗
    If I trust it to do this analysis in the first place, it can probably manage the copy+paste?
12. antihero · 1791152903 · focus · HN ↗
  Absolutely love the fact that they reference a "real package manager" like npm, which has been used in countless supply chain attacks, and brew, which can also run arbitrary scripts (though less likely in the mainline brew stuff, which many packages aren't able to be in).
  Avoiding curlbashing is masking a deeper problem.
  1. Doctor_Fegg · 1791174080 · focus · HN ↗
    This. curl | bash has never nuked my local Postgres db, unlike one of the recommended package managers.
13. nunez · 1791157369 · focus · HN ↗
  i don't see the issue. you can view the script before you run it. shoot, you can feed the script to an LLM and have it do a security check beforehand
bigyabai · 1791145062 · focus · HN ↗
Something horrible must have happened, if macOS users are curling shell scripts from the internet to make their desktops more like Linux.
1. nomel · 1791145820 · focus · HN ↗
  Nope. The only people who notice or care about any of this are those who can't accommodate the storage. Outside that, it all just works better now (especially Siri).
  1. behnamoh · 1791145932 · focus · HN ↗
    Saying that Siri "works" is peak Apple fanboism.
    nvme0n1p1 · 1791148699 · focus · HN ↗
    Also "those who can't accommodate the storage" is funny.
    What's that? You didn't pay Apple's 1200% markup on storage, just to have room for your actual work after the OS fills your disk with a bunch of bloat? What are you, poor?
    internet2000 · 1791148952 · focus · HN ↗
    The new one just works. Do try it.
    bigyabai · 1791149519 · focus · HN ↗
    It damn well better, for using 14gb+ of storage.
    IndySun · 1791156240 · focus · HN ↗
    [delayed]
    Bud · 1791149133 · focus · HN ↗
    [dead]
  2. trollbridge · 1791146550 · focus · HN ↗
    People with 256GB laptops care when the 27 AI stuff burns up 10-20% of their storage.
    GeekyBear · 1791146775 · focus · HN ↗
    So don't install Chrome.
    trollbridge · 1791147385 · focus · HN ↗
    Most people want Chrome for the inevitable site that doesn’t work in Safari.
    The problem is Apple intelligence is decent, but not worth 20% of your storage decent.
    GeekyBear · 1791155883 · focus · HN ↗
    Chrome downloads a large LLM without warning or permission.
    Frankly, the only company attempting to create websites that only work in Chrome is Google.
  3. sajithdilshan · 1791150437 · focus · HN ↗
    Do people actually use Siri AI on the Mac? Whenever I need something done that needs AI on a mac I just use Claude Code.
    I can imagine Siri AI being useful on iOS because of its deep integration to the OS. But for MacOS there’s better tools
    Marsymars · 1791177966 · focus · HN ↗
    > Do people actually use Siri AI on the Mac?
    I'll probably use it at some point. I don't have any interest in installing apps from, or paying money to OpenAI or Anthropic.
2. swozey · 1791146244 · focus · HN ↗
  I'm sick of juggling disk space on my 1tb laptop AND I don't want an llm attack vector anywhere near my machine, this things getting nuked from orbit or i'm not updating to golden gate, ever.
3. trollbridge · 1791146517 · focus · HN ↗
  curl|bash is now standard way to install packages on both macOS and Linux. It’s maddening, but it is now.
  1. pjmlp · 1791146696 · focus · HN ↗
    Meanwhile on Windows we mostly use the store or winget, funny times.
    trollbridge · 1791147335 · focus · HN ↗
    Yeah. I think of Windows as basically “homebrew comes preinstalled”.
  2. [deleted] · 1791147196 · focus · HN ↗
    [deleted]
4. drnick1 · 1791146661 · focus · HN ↗
  Uncomfortable, but true.
  GNOME has reached maturity and hasn't changed significantly in years, while Apple is busy destroying macOS.
  1. dijit · 1791147377 · focus · HN ↗
    Really? GNOME is not what I would recommend to people.
    I should applaud their efforts, and I get that much of it is voluntary, but their bugs are numerous, notable and the way they interact with the rest of the universe (both people with accessibility needs, and the wider developer ecosystem on linux) can most accurately be described as arrogant and hostile.
    KDE is the bastion of maturity here, and I would agree that it is mature.
    I’m not sure how the love for GNOME continues when KDE (while not my personal choice) has clearly been running circles around it since GNOME3 and the gap has only widened.
    bigyabai · 1791148482 · focus · HN ↗
    Both desktops are pretty mature. I've run both of their Wayland stacks, and Mutter/KWin both perform great these days. It really comes down to personal preference for most use-cases.
    armadyl · 1791172958 · focus · HN ↗
    > I’m not sure how the love for GNOME continues
    Because KDE looks and feels straight out of 2010 compared to GNOME? GNOME just suffers by leaving some (what should be integrated) features to its shitty extension system.
5. Angostura · 1791149084 · focus · HN ↗
  The want some disk space back.
  Personally, my limited experimentation with Apple AI has left me quite liking it.
  The contents of the Exportable’Privacy Report’ are interesting to look through
6. applicative · 1791149986 · focus · HN ↗
  [delayed]
7. neya · 1791153258 · focus · HN ↗
  Their world view that "Apple can do no wrong" is slowly shattering, it seems
behnamoh · 1791145286 · focus · HN ↗
Oh, things are about to get worse with the new macOS "privacy/security" measures. They are going to curb agentic workflows even more. I don't know how Apple just finds new ways to annoy developers, but we're in a minority after all. Of 200 million Mac users, probably just up to 1 million are developers, and the rest are normies who can't tell when they should authorize or cancel the pop-up.
1. doawoo · 1791145481 · focus · HN ↗
  I'd argue that a lot of developers can't determine if an LLM generated command is actually safe or not.
2. wartywhoa23 · 1791145572 · focus · HN ↗
  Ah, if only that meant that there'll be less slop in the macOS code itself..
3. NamlchakKhandro · 1791145892 · focus · HN ↗
  Apple hates developers
  1. pjmlp · 1791146618 · focus · HN ↗
    They love the ones that buy Apple hardware to develop apps for iDevices, pay the dev subscription and store fees for apps, or simply because they wanted a shiny UNIX and don't consider BSD/Linux OEMs worth their money.
4. [deleted] · 1791146000 · focus · HN ↗
  [deleted]
5. ultrarunner · 1791147026 · focus · HN ↗
  With LLMs, everyone's a developer now. Welcome to the mainstream.
6. fmajid · 1791147127 · focus · HN ↗
  It’s not about privacy, it’s about kneecapping competitors, just like when they blocked the advertising ID but exempted themselves from this because “Apple is not a third-party, we’re a second-party”.
  Apple is an advertising company and thus inherently untrustworthy.
hypfer · 1791146416 · focus · HN ↗
This is stuff on the level of O&O ShutUp10. Which is a good tool, but also, a Windows tool for very (back in the day) Windows-specific nonsense.
What's going on at Apple product strategy?
1. userbinator · 1791147289 · focus · HN ↗
  It's interesting to see more customisation tools appearing for macOS, as just a few years ago I was looking for ways to strip down the OS (CI related), and while such info was widely available in the Windows world, to the point that customised "distros" are available, it was nearly nonexistent for macOS; only the Hackintosh community had some useful articles on how things worked.
  Could the rise of LLMs and vibe-coding have motivated people who otherwise wouldn't bother?
  1. someguyiguess · 1791147636 · focus · HN ↗
    I’ve learned more about MacOS / FreeBSD / launchd / objective c / swift / cocoa etc because of Claude code. I have a massively better understanding of how macOS works and have customized my computer to a level further than I ever did with a Linux box pre-AI. So I am one of those people you ask about.
  2. gumby · 1791147901 · focus · HN ↗
    It’s hard to strip it down these days as the OS image and its core, immutable filesystem cannot be edited. Admittedly this helps keep idiots from destroying their filesystem and also blocks many malware attacks on the system, but, for example. I don’t believe you can delete the chess program.
    dylan604 · 1791150523 · focus · HN ↗
    This is one of those things where you have to ask yourself "how do you get it so wrong?". I get the idea of protecting from malware/self-harm, but to not allow removal of such a pointless app is just befuddling. At least Microsoft trying to say that Explorer was core to the OS, but a chess app? I never did buy into Explorer being core until the day I accidentally pasted an URL into File Explorer's path and it rendered the webpage. I don't understand why someone thought that was necessary to allow to happen, but there it was, core to the OS.
    skydhash · 1791151346 · focus · HN ↗
    I think it’s because all those apps use core technologies so their bundle size is tiny. You hide them and never think about them (like the old windows media player). Most of windows optional features are very much in your face all the time.
    dylan604 · 1791156767 · focus · HN ↗
    please explain how a chess game is core technology
    skydhash · 1791157260 · focus · HN ↗
    Not that the are core technologies, more like they use whatever default libraries (Frameworks in Apple parlance) that are already there. Just like no one bothered to remove paint or wordpad in the old days (even with only 20gb of hdd)
    userbinator · 1791160128 · focus · HN ↗
    Just like no one bothered to remove paint or wordpad in the old days (even with only 20gb of hdd)
    Trivial to remove (just delete the files), but also very little in the way of savings --- less than 1MB each.
    userbinator · 1791150999 · focus · HN ↗
    and its core, immutable filesystem cannot be edited
    That's a half-truth at best; I can just open the disk image in a hex editor if nothing else understands the format.
    Hackintoshers have figured out how to add/modify drivers etc. It's certainly not without obstacles, but that's still very far from "impossible". If I remember correctly, you need to re-snapshot the FS and tell the bootloader to boot from it.
    (And necessarily, ignoring the countless cries of "it can't be done" was how I was able to accomplish my goal... I knew that it was possible since I could edit any bit of the FS; figuring out which files I could remove and patch was the hard and undocumented part.)
    kbolino · 1791151872 · focus · HN ↗
    You can (still) do anything you want if you disable kernel security and SIP, but if you bit-bang the FS while SIP is enabled, it will revert your changes upon detection.
    odo1242 · 1791168825 · focus · HN ↗
    The entire system is signed and verified at boot. Any change to a macOS system outside of /Users, /Applications, and whatever else the OS lets you edit can't really be edited without disabling System Integrity Protection (which isn't recommended)
    codys · 1791157018 · focus · HN ↗
    The sealing of the filesystem can be disabled trivially, though, via a command line tool that Apple ships with MacOS that you run from recovery mode.
    And then you can remount `/` as read-write, and create a new blessed snapshot with your changes made to it.
    This doesn't actually delete the signed snapshot though, so the space consumed by `/System/Applications/Chess` still is consumed. I'm not sure if MacOS will allow deleting the final sealed snapshot for `/`. It might, I don't know that anyone is clamoring for it though.
    userbinator · 1791159774 · focus · HN ↗
    I don't have my detailed notes from when I did this, but I believe you should be able to copy everything you want to keep to a new filesystem.
    saghm · 1791165915 · focus · HN ↗
    > It’s hard to strip it down these days as the OS image and its core, immutable filesystem cannot be edited.
    Does disabling SIP, rebooting, making changes, then turning it back on and rebooting again not work anymore?
    codys · 1791169683 · focus · HN ↗
    One has to also `csrutil authenticated-root disable`, and then to get changes to stick use `bless` to create a new snapshot to boot.
    But that's it.
2. neya · 1791149492 · focus · HN ↗
  Apple was late to the AI party. Usually, that's their strategy - let everyone else innovate, when the ecosystem is mature, steal it and claim it as their own. That worked well for decades. But, the pace of AI is too fast to pull this trick off again, so now they're in panic mode. So they do what every shitty corporate does - shove AI down everyone's throat, whether they want it or not. Which is ironically against their founder's motto - build stuff that people want.
  I'm not sure there were enough people looking at finder and thinking "I wish I could talk to an AI to open a file on my desktop which I could've simply double clicked on anyway"
3. jojobas · 1791149511 · focus · HN ↗
  Why would you expect Apple X strategy to be different from Microsoft X strategy?
  1. saghm · 1791166023 · focus · HN ↗
    Decades of precedent of them doing stuff differently, I imagine
  2. chihuahua · 1791173107 · focus · HN ↗
    They had a massive ad campaign about "think different", were you not paying attention? /s
webbrainiac · 1791146476 · focus · HN ↗
[dead]
michal_kurowski · 1791147240 · focus · HN ↗
[dead]
the_arun · 1791147705 · focus · HN ↗
How do we believe this tool? Is it secure?
1. nujabe · 1791149916 · focus · HN ↗
  It’s open source, go find out and report back.
  1. brigandish · 1791161699 · focus · HN ↗
    As far as I recall, Apple does not do reproducible builds or show you the checksum of the built product, so how would one know that the software installed is the software they saw the source for?
    saghm · 1791166518 · focus · HN ↗
    I mean, that sounds a lot more like you're concerned about Apple shipping you insecure software, because it's strictly harder to audit what you have from them compared to what you'd get from this tool.
2. ruhrohraggy · 1791158831 · focus · HN ↗
  [dead]
pyaamb · 1791147808 · focus · HN ↗
Is there a way to do this manually?
1. detourdog · 1791149985 · focus · HN ↗
  <a href="https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-250012366" rel="nofollow">https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-250012366
nailer · 1791148311 · focus · HN ↗
> Every release is built from its tag by GitHub Actions and carries a build provenance attestation.
Huh cool. They're doing curl | bash properly.
1. woodruffw · 1791149103 · focus · HN ↗
  That doesn't seem to do much in the `curl | bash` setting, given that you're not verifying the attestation in that case. You still need to download it separately and run `gh attestation verify` first.
  (Note that the attestation does not appear to cover the shell script either, it only covers the script's final payload.)
2. ruhrohraggy · 1791158945 · focus · HN ↗
  [dead]
neuroelectron · 1791148316 · focus · HN ↗
Not a lot of good reasons to upgrade to 27. They removed Rosetta and you have to reinstall that if you want it. So is MacOS turning into something that more regular people are going to have to maintain in the future or end up with something like Windows 11?
I switched to MacOS 3 years ago because of Microsoft and the writing on the wall seems to say I got another year left before I'm forced into Linux. Because if I have to maintain my own OS then I might as well install Linux and do it once.
1. halJordan · 1791148536 · focus · HN ↗
  If a temporary tool being retired is the reason you switch, then wait until you find out how many LOC are being deleted from the linux kernel this year and next
  1. jonathanstrange · 1791149305 · focus · HN ↗
    It's not a temporary tool for people who need it.
    2muchcoffeeman · 1791150516 · focus · HN ↗
    The alternative is maintaining backwards compatibility forever and then everyone will complain about some weird behaviour that still happens to retain that compatibility.
    Keep in mind this is the second time they have switched arches and the second round of complaints of Rosetta removal.
    idontwantthis · 1791151032 · focus · HN ↗
    I think they have a lot more reason to keep it around this time. PowerPC was a dead-end and x86 is most definitely sticking around.
    jonathanstrange · 1791153686 · focus · HN ↗
    Exactly, I remember getting similar replies - though probably on /. then - when the PPC emulator was removed, there are always some people eager to ridicule the idea and portray it as not being feasible. But it is. It is perfectly doable for a company like Apple with a net worth around $4.87 trillion and would probably take less disk space then the AI models their customers now try to remove because they don't need them. As ridiculous as this may sound to the naysayers, I desire very much for an operating system to keep backwards compatibility forever, it can be done and would be very useful for many people.
    I didn't want the PPC emulator removed and I don't want the x86 emulator to be removed either. If that makes me a weirdo, so be it.
    2muchcoffeeman · 1791160126 · focus · HN ↗
    I’m not saying it’s not feasible. See Windows. The effort that Microsoft put into backwards compatibility was incredible. But it’s also questionable.
    Even a good emulator might fix bugs that some piece of software relied on.
    It’s certainly a shame if they got rid of Rosetta forever so hopefully it’s still available as an optional download.
    dwaite · 1791175408 · focus · HN ↗
    Third switch. 68000 series to PPC to Intel to Apple Silicon.
    Now that they have stopped supporting Intel-based Macs, I understand the desire to not have to port new code and features to x86-64 to keep legacy apps happy.
    That is why Intel-based Mac App support is going away, but Rosetta 2 as infrastructure will remain - a much smaller footprint of system functionality will be addressable by x86-64 code that they can reasonably maintain going forward.
    That's actually better than where I thought we would be now - I thought by M6 they would remove the hardware extensions that allow Rosetta 2 function from Apple Silicon.
2. azinman2 · 1791149908 · focus · HN ↗
  Nearly everything is improved and the new Siri is great.
  1. dylan604 · 1791150574 · focus · HN ↗
    Unless you're not running a M-series chip, then it's not really improving anything
    alex43578 · 1791152731 · focus · HN ↗
    That's 6+ year old hardware then, so even in Apple's world, that's pretty old.
    chipotle_coyote · 1791154103 · focus · HN ↗
    If you're not running an Apple Silicon chip, you can't run macOS 27 at all.
  2. macintux · 1791158976 · focus · HN ↗
    [delayed]
3. coldtea · 1791157257 · focus · HN ↗
  >Not a lot of good reasons to upgrade to 27.
  There's a singular very good reason to upgrade to 27 and any new version (at least when a .1 minor version is out and the kinds have been ironed): the whole ecosystem works better when you are on the latest stuff.
  So unless you have legacy app needs, or need ultra stability for stuff like running a video shop or something, it makes sense to keep up, or at least don't fall more than 1-2 versions behind.
  >They removed Rosetta and you have to reinstall that if you want it.
  And they'll kill it entirely in a future version. It's been like 6 years for getting apps to Apple Silicon versions. And it's generally not ideal to run both AS and Intel programs if you can avoid it (wastes double the system lib memories, Intel misses some extra protections, etc).
  >I switched to MacOS 3 years ago
  OK, this explains it. So macOS is not like Windows where you can have even 15 years old version of the OS and programs still work forever.
  1. ruhrohraggy · 1791158885 · focus · HN ↗
    [dead]
pietz · 1791148430 · focus · HN ↗
This should have been a prompt.
bryzaguy · 1791148877 · focus · HN ↗
> Agate LLC reports expecting a refund of $55,822,472 from 2025 taxes. Fireball LLC is expecting a refund of $39,171,573.39 from 2025 taxes. Westwood Solutions LLC, the Google-owned data center in Omaha, is expecting a refund of $22,558,881 from 2025 taxes.
WOW!
iAMkenough · 1791148941 · focus · HN ↗
Now I just need a tool that restores the ability to customize the Siri shortcut on my keyboard.
I just want to hold command+space like pre-Golden Gate allowed for, since that's what my muscle memory is trained on.
formvoltron · 1791149061 · focus · HN ↗
this is awesome!!
Does apple not realize there is an SSD crisis happening? Used to love apple (Apple IIc was my first computer). But now? Terrible.
1. deprave · 1791150545 · focus · HN ↗
  Another thing that bit me is that automatic updates reserve disk space even if no update is available. It makes sense when you have plenty of disk space but on my MacBook Air with 256gb of storage it was about 10% that I got back after turning off automatic updates. I’ll get a Mac with more storage next time so I don’t have to do that.
ryandrake · 1791149394 · focus · HN ↗
Reminds me of all the de-crufting you've always needed to do when you install Windows. Looks like we've gotten to the point on macOS too, where you need to run third party scripts on a new OS installation to gain back control of your system resources and remove unwanted crapware.
1. azinman2 · 1791149858 · focus · HN ↗
  What makes you call it crapware? The new spotlight search (from Siri) is amazing and super convenient.
  1. adastra22 · 1791150062 · focus · HN ↗
    I don’t want to make my search more ambiguous. That is the opposite of what I want.
    ianm218 · 1791152066 · focus · HN ↗
    The existing search on macOS was almost completely useless to be fair
    dreamcompiler · 1791153720 · focus · HN ↗
    Spotlight search has sucked from Day 1 of OSX. You need to use Find Any File [0] or some equivalent tool if you want to search the actual file system without being limited by Spotlight's never-properly-updated "index."
    The functionality of Find Any File was built in to Mac OS 9 and earlier. It was rock-solid reliable. So of course Apple removed it and now to get reliable search you have to use a third-party tool. Or 'find' in the Terminal.
    [0] <a href="https://findanyfile.app/" rel="nofollow">https://findanyfile.app/
    appletrotter · 1791156172 · focus · HN ↗
    This is why I rip out spotlight on my mac and replace it with FZF
    alexgoodhart · 1791164213 · focus · HN ↗
    Spotlight was really good on Tiger idkwym
  2. lynndotpy · 1791150697 · focus · HN ↗
    The new spotlight search replaced what I previously used, made it function worse for what I used it for, and uses 30GiB of already very scarce disk space.
    For many users, it is a strict downgrade that was forced on them against their consent.
    empthought · 1791154936 · focus · HN ↗
    How was it "against their consent?" The Siri AI / Apple Intelligence feature required a user to explicitly enable it. It didn't just get enabled for you.
    I know this because I just explicitly enabled it, and now I have the new Spotlight search. I didn't have it before I enabled it.
    appletrotter · 1791156108 · focus · HN ↗
    I never asked for it, I had to disable it
    lynndotpy · 1791161842 · focus · HN ↗
    [delayed]
  3. therein · 1791150775 · focus · HN ↗
    Can it now consistently find things in /Applications when I type the full name?
    That's revolutionary.
    trollbridge · 1791152385 · focus · HN ↗
    No.
    I made my own “pseudo spotlight” and mapped it to ⌘-Space specifically for this. It just goes against old fashioned locate/updatedb, but with a very quick check against /Applications first + running the search query through bc and if it’s valid syntax, showing the math result.
    azinman2 · 1791159973 · focus · HN ↗
    You’re missing the entire new world of personal context retrieval.
  4. cryptolobster · 1791155500 · focus · HN ↗
    Just because something is convenient or necessary for you, it doesn't mean it is convenient or necessary for everyone
2. Smalltalker-80 · 1791149972 · focus · HN ↗
  True that, win11debloat is 'mandatory' nowadays. The time that OS makers competed with each other with features users actually wanted is long gone, alas.. This is why Linux is now making more serious momentum.
  1. skydhash · 1791150987 · focus · HN ↗
    I got an old disk with a win10 installation on it. It lasted only three days. It was because of all the pinging from notifications and all the CTA buttons (like Sign in to Onedrive in the settings). It felt like a minefield where a click can blow your whole setup.
    I wipe the whole thing and installed Fedora.
    I could tolerate windows if I needed a particular set of software on it, but no way that I could use it as a daily driver.
  2. ChickeNES · 1791153243 · focus · HN ↗
    Mandatory for what? I run stock Win11 for the most part, haven’t have had any real issues with it. I think I disabled/modified a few mouse hotspots and key combos, and that’s been about it. Sure during major updates there’s the “buy our shit” rigmarole, but at this point I just click through and then forget about it for another month or two. Annoying yes, but compared to actual annoyances in my life…I just can’t be bothered to care or get mad, to be honest.
    throooooo · 1791159063 · focus · HN ↗
    Depending on how much you value your privacy or not being annoyed, some people see it as mandatory.
3. 2muchcoffeeman · 1791150186 · focus · HN ↗
  On windows you got garbage like trial versions of Blah software.
  This is a fully functioning feature that people don’t like for what ever reason.
  1. 2III7 · 1791150657 · focus · HN ↗
    Fully functional feature consuming multiple gigabytes of storage and has questionable functional value. Maybe people don't want bloated AI crap on their desktops?
    2muchcoffeeman · 1791150898 · focus · HN ↗
    I’m not making any judgement on whether you should or should not like the feature.
    I’m stating that the Windows problem was very different. Your machine would be loaded up with software for various vendors that the manufacturer did deals with to lower the price of the machine. They were all trials.
    buran77 · 1791153989 · focus · HN ↗
    > I’m stating that the Windows problem was very different. [...] They were all trials.
    Except it isn't and they weren't. MS Windows never came with trials, it came with shortcuts. OEMs bundled with their Windows image more of their (crap) full software than trials.
    And to this day debloating tools are tasked with removing full MS software like Teams, Outlook, Copilot, M365, Recall, etc. So exactly the same problem as Apple's MacOS.
    ternaryoperator · 1791177884 · focus · HN ↗
    [delayed]
    Stitch4223 · 1791152353 · focus · HN ↗
    “Some people” arguments always hold true.
    Old classmates back in the day used to hate the 128 × 128 px icons macOS shipped. A waste of space for eye candy.
    12 GB is at most 4.68% of your Mac. Improving on Apple Intelligence is something of value, as is consumerizing local-first AI.
    We’re not talking adware here.
    verandaguy · 1791153080 · focus · HN ↗
    > Improving on Apple Intelligence is something of value
    Not if you didn't use apple intelligence in the first place (and/or aren't interested in using it going forward).
    > as is consumerizing local-first AI
    If and only if there is actual demand for it. If most users do not want this, it's a bad feature.
    samudrijan · 1791155531 · focus · HN ↗
    That’s a whole 4% of my disc. Get that out of there.
    appletrotter · 1791156054 · focus · HN ↗
    Apple's AI and harnesses are trash and a complete waste of space
    Also suggesting that sacrificing 1/20 of your disk space is NBD is crazy. I have to prune space on my drive all the time because macs ship with the least amount of disk space that apple imagines they can get away with as possible.
    groundzeros2015 · 1791156148 · focus · HN ↗
    Are you arguing that the icons did not occupy a scarce resource that could have been used for other things? Or that the value is so obvious it we worth it?
    athoneycutt · 1791157054 · focus · HN ↗
    Useful or not there should be an option to turn it off and get space back (plus avoid LLM) if you want.
    bloqs · 1791157306 · focus · HN ↗
    4% of my disk on a computer with soldered storage hardware?
    Is the marketing really getting this good?
    EA-3167 · 1791157871 · focus · HN ↗
    This is going to shock you I suspect, it seems to be something many here fail to consider in any number of circumstances: You don't represent a majority of anything. A majority of people buying Macs, a majority of people they market to, a majority of who they design for, a majority of who they product test against. In fact I'd venture to guess that you like many here represent a vocal portion of a tiny minority that are almost impossible to please without the sort of full customization of hardware and software you want. It's much easier to neglect that small market in favor of the one that prints them money, and I'm always baffled that so many don't understand that.
    People here misunderstand just how different they are to the norm. "I want x, y, z to be free so I can modify it!" Most people buying Apple products don't, hell most people buying any phone doesn't want that, they want a smartphone that works out of the box and never fails to be a smartphone. The walled garden is largely a feature and not a bug, it's just not a feature you want, just like the aesthetics, social factors, ease of use, etc don't matter to you as much as function.
    Most people aren't like that.
    isityettime · 1791159476 · focus · HN ↗
    5% is huge. And the way app bundles work on macOS, tons and tons of disk space gets burned up for each application relative to on an OS like Linux distros, so each GB doesn't go as far in the first place.
    quaddoggy · 1791161993 · focus · HN ↗
    Yes, but it’s death by a thousand cuts. I encourage you to see how much BS space is taken up by iMovie or Live Photos or whatever on your iPhone. If every team at Apple wants their percentage you end up with less.
    mahboi · 1791166938 · focus · HN ↗
    iMovie isn't installed by default, and live photos are an option at least
    jtbayly · 1791162668 · focus · HN ↗
    Wrong. 12GB is potentially 9.4% of your disk. At the very least, the original M1 MacBook Air (perhaps others) could be purchased with 128GB of storage.
    52sk · 1791173252 · focus · HN ↗
    The M1 MacBook Air did not have a 128 GB storage option.
    penskymaterial · 1791165370 · focus · HN ↗
    Bruh the entire Mac OS used to fit in 20 GB and nothing they have added since has meaningfully improved my life, though some has made it more difficult.
    That extra space is for my media.
  2. dsego · 1791150864 · focus · HN ↗
    IE is also a fully functioning feature.
  3. isityettime · 1791151146 · focus · HN ↗
    People have been doing the same thing with Cortana on Windows for ages. "Debloating" tools don't primarily target OEM add-ons like free trials of this or that; they very much target Windows components.
    hansonkd · 1791151743 · focus · HN ↗
    Cortana was heavily integrated with bing. It was essentially a way to get people to use bing.
    knollimar · 1791155110 · focus · HN ↗
    I swear didn't they lose a big antitrust case for doing this once already?
  4. nalekberov · 1791151193 · focus · HN ↗
    "fully functioning feature" -- more like fully functioning forceware/crapware which holds significant space.
    So, it's not for "what ever reason", it's quite a reason to reject this.
  5. burnte · 1791151407 · focus · HN ↗
    On Windows there are lots of fully features features/applications people turn off. It's not all trial versions and it's disingenuous to pretend it's just that.
  6. ramijames · 1791151433 · focus · HN ↗
    I just don't use it. I'm on a laptop with 500gb. I don't want to lose on so much disk space for a feature I won't use.
  7. Grombobulous · 1791151723 · focus · HN ↗
    Automatically downloading AI models into disk space with no user-facing way to turn it off is especially hostile considering Apple as vendor of both the OS and the hardware is the same entity that overcharges for non-upgradable SSD storage in their machines.
    penskymaterial · 1791152216 · focus · HN ↗
    They'll rent you more iCloud space when you fill up the SSD. That's good, holistic customer service.
    stingraycharles · 1791152608 · focus · HN ↗
    That doesn’t work unless you’re actually able to offload stuff from disk, which is only the case when you store stuff in your iCloud Drive / photos / etc.
    Case in point: the AI models can’t be offloaded to iCloud.
    penskymaterial · 1791153555 · focus · HN ↗
    Maybe someone can explain why their SSDs, when not soldered down, are a proprietary form factor and can't be replaced with a standard M.2 device?
    theodric · 1791154236 · focus · HN ↗
    To gain the same effect as one that is soldered down, while giving themselves a simpler portfolio of assemblies and a cheaper FRU to swap in the event of failure.
    m4rtink · 1791158213 · focus · HN ↗
    So vendor locking to make more money. :)
    stingraycharles · 1791154737 · focus · HN ↗
    I believe they have a special kind of SSD, where the controller is locked into the motherboard. This is serial locked in some form.
    (Correct me if I’m wrong, but this is how I understand it)
    Grombobulous · 1791158695 · focus · HN ↗
    My understanding is that the controller is integrated into the SoC.
    You can actually replace the storage on Apple desktops but it’s a bit of a pain and isn’t as cheap as m.2 2280 drives.
    I don’t really know why Apple does this when their solution doesn’t seem to offer an obvious advantage. They aren’t faster than existing solutions or anything like that.
    throooooo · 1791160112 · focus · HN ↗
    Vendor lock-in increases their profit margins. If people could purchase a 128GB Mac mini and install their own 2TB drives they wouldn't make as much money.
    odo1242 · 1791162649 · focus · HN ↗
    It’s not actually serial locked, you can replace SSDs by desoldering and resoldering a NAND chip. But basically their SSD controller is integrated into the M-series chips (mostly because cheaper, less connectors to manufacture). But it’s a very specialized process
    stingraycharles · 1791163105 · focus · HN ↗
    I think most consumers would happily pay a bit extra for these controllers if it meant that they could manually upgrade their SSDs. I can’t help but have the feeling that it’s also quite convenient for Apple that all this stuff is effectively non-replaceable / upgradable.
    I don’t think the benefits are the same as with their RAM being part of their SoC, as that gives them real speed improvements, right?
    floydnoel · 1791166986 · focus · HN ↗
    I disagree. I think 90% or more wouldn't care.
    Barbing · 1791173936 · focus · HN ↗
    Indeed,
    > manually upgrade
    or “average Apple customer”, pick one
    btw something beautiful about the YouTube videos of shops in China doing those SSD deletes with the power tools
    ascorbic · 1791178542 · focus · HN ↗
    I'd be amazed if even 1% care
    JumpCrisscross · 1791174222 · focus · HN ↗
    > it’s also quite convenient for Apple that all this stuff is effectively non-replaceable / upgradable
    On the other hand, I’m happily banging away on my ca. 2020 M1 MacBook Pro. It just got a warranty service, free to me, that replaced the screen. It will probably get replaced around 2030. That simply isn’t the norm with the alternatives.
    The hypothesis that this is self serving isn’t supported by the evidence. Instead it’s more parsimonious to conclude that this is Apple being Apple with pushing design to the limit when it comes to executing a vision. User-upgradable parts have not been part of that vision since Jobs returned.
    klrefg · 1791180255 · focus · HN ↗
    > User-upgradable parts have not been part of that vision since Jobs returned.
    Macs were quite repairable and most parts were replaceable until ~2012. So it’s hard to blame Jobs for that.
    LoganDark · 1791169800 · focus · HN ↗
    Note that before the Mac mini socketed SSDs, Retina MacBook Pros had socketed SSDs as well. They were not standard M.2 either though, and you had to get specific aftermarket parts from the likes of OWC
    dwaite · 1791173507 · focus · HN ↗
    My understanding is that they are not SSDs - they lack a disk controller, instead providing flash memory more directly to the SoC
    tavavex · 1791159218 · focus · HN ↗
    I'm not sure if you're being sarcastic, but what you're calling "good, holistic customer service" is more commonly described as "inventing a problem and then selling you the solution".
    mancerayder · 1791161241 · focus · HN ↗
    Google is doing the same on Android - there's no native tool to search for large images and videos by date. There's a Purchase Google Cloud Storage type of header that pops up when you start to get full, and you can delete whatever is quick to find or remember to delete, like WhatsApp media, which you find through an annoying directory structure with a broken tool. It's terrible.
    saghm · 1791165039 · focus · HN ↗
    Gosh, maybe there are two companies that are both doing the same bad thing, rather than the thing being good?
    nozzlegear · 1791158303 · focus · HN ↗
    Like it or not, Siri is one of the features of macOS and has been for a long time. It's not just some arbitrary AI model that Apple decided to store on your disk.
    jtbayly · 1791162458 · focus · HN ↗
    “Siri” has existed for a long time, yes. Apple Intelligence, not so much. It really is just an arbitrary AI model, since I’ve had Siri for a decade and not needed whatever this extra 13GB model is.
    nozzlegear · 1791166453 · focus · HN ↗
    [delayed]
    klrefg · 1791180466 · focus · HN ↗
    > Whether you use it or not is not germane to whether the model is justified
    Huh.. well yeah, who cares what users need or want. Perfect attitude for a company making money by selling products to consumers.
    saghm · 1791165129 · focus · HN ↗
    And yet somehow they managed to not take up 12 GB of disk space that required running multiple manual steps to get back for a while.
    nozzlegear · 1791166492 · focus · HN ↗
    [delayed]
    klrefg · 1791180509 · focus · HN ↗
    The majority of Macs sold have tiny SSDs. So not really.
    dominotw · 1791165309 · focus · HN ↗
    macos has tons for features. you expect them to provide a way for users individually turn off each feature in the os ?
    hibikir · 1791166981 · focus · HN ↗
    Many arbitrary features can be turned off: I haven't turned on Siri on a phone for many years, because the utility was minimal vs the annoyance of errors in voice activation. Taking very significant space in your drive is just as important. I can uninstall Pages and Garage Band. I should be able to uninstall apple intelligence
    ctippett · 1791177627 · focus · HN ↗
    I can uninstall Pages and Garage Band.
    Not Chess.app though!
    alsetmusic · 1791168379 · focus · HN ↗
    If it consumes valuable disk space (especially with current insane market prices), yes.
    klrefg · 1791180369 · focus · HN ↗
    To be fair.. why not?
    simondotau · 1791177087 · focus · HN ↗
    Meanwhile, other people are complaining about companies making you rely on cloud compute for AI. The exciting thing about Apple Intelligence is the prospect of writing apps with the assumption that it exists on everyone’s computer.
    pprotas · 1791177491 · focus · HN ↗
    You can’t assume that though, Apple Intelligence is not supported on everyone’s computer
    slipheen · 1791179359 · focus · HN ↗
    Apple Intelligence, for better or worse, runs on every Apple silicon Mac. Any machine which can run macOs 27 can run the local models. Some machines may run better local models if they gave 12+GB of ram, but I don't think it's accurate to say that Apple Intelligence is not supported universally.
    In this context we are talking about macOS 27. If your app requires 27, then it can correctly assume every machine will work.
    Grimblewald · 1791179219 · focus · HN ↗
    there's a third option youre missing here that people are consistent on: AI shpuld be opt in and nothing prevents opt in being default. AI isnt reliable or universally useful enough to include it defacto.
  8. anvuong · 1791152105 · focus · HN ↗
    > This is a fully functioning feature that people don’t like for what ever reason.
    Are you working at Apple or is your life dependent on Apple stocks?
  9. penskymaterial · 1791152119 · focus · HN ↗
    This simply isn't true.
    Trial versions are installed by the OEMs so that's not a Windows problem.
    Microsoft has given you the tools (Group Policy) for the last 25+ years to customize most of this.
    My last install of Windows 11 was shockingly frustrating but with a little patience and discipline it's customized to Windows 7 levels of sanity using nothing but out of the box tools. Shockingly, it works better than writing angry blog posts about it.
    They have to give you a choice because they have surly enterprise customers who would be upset otherwise.
    Terr_ · 1791157002 · focus · HN ↗
    > Microsoft has given you the tools (Group Policy) for the last 25+ years to customize most of this.
    Morally, why should Home users have to pay a $70 upgrade (or whatever it is) to the company extorting them with forced-on crap they didn't originally have and don't want?
    ericmay · 1791162178 · focus · HN ↗
    It is a Windows problem because Microsoft allowed OEMs to do it and when you bought a computer, it included Windows and from the end user perspective Windows thus included this software.
    > Microsoft has given you the tools (Group Policy) for the last 25+ years to customize most of this.
    Most people including me don’t know what this is and more importantly they just don’t care. The frame of reference is “I buy (vendor) laptop and Windows comes with all this stupid stuff I have to uninstall”. It is never “I bought Windows and I just use the Group Policy to do XYZ, and then….”.
  10. bigyabai · 1791152504 · focus · HN ↗
    AppleTV, Apple Music+ modal advertisements, iCloud... it's all trial slopware.
  11. Wazzymandias · 1791155015 · focus · HN ↗
    I don't need a more bloated operating system or greater resource usage for things I don't want, use, or need. i'd prefer a calendar app that doesn't suck, and an OS that doesn't decrease performance by 5-15% on every new upgrade for slightly older machines
  12. SAI_Peregrinus · 1791155314 · focus · HN ↗
    It's the same reason IDEs have been largely supplanted by plugin-based editors & discrete toolchains. Integrating everything the user might want wastes lots of resources and includes things the user will never want.
  13. mahboi · 1791159813 · focus · HN ↗
    That's how it was in like 2000-2008. Modern Windows bloat is the OS itself.
  14. frollogaston · 1791161673 · focus · HN ↗
    I don't like it cause it uses 12GB
  15. saghm · 1791164952 · focus · HN ↗
    Maybe they don't like it because they don't have any desire to use it, and they didn't ask for it?
  16. JumpCrisscross · 1791174057 · focus · HN ↗
    > a fully functioning feature that people don’t like for what ever reason
    I’m genuinely struggling to use it on my Mac.
  17. itake · 1791177843 · focus · HN ↗
    I currently have alternative versions of these tools. I would rather run the latest qwen model or SOTA models than whatever outdated model Apple wants me to use.
4. gchamonlive · 1791151209 · focus · HN ↗
  This will always be the case with proprietary software, invariably. Just a matter of time.
  1. frollogaston · 1791162499 · focus · HN ↗
    Linux distros have shot themselves in the foot plenty of times
    gchamonlive · 1791164592 · focus · HN ↗
    [delayed]
5. drooopy · 1791152593 · focus · HN ↗
  Not gonna lie, I would like a "Black Edition" of macOS. There is a decent OS buried under tons of rubble.
  1. ozgrakkurt · 1791153340 · focus · HN ↗
    Recently switched to KDE on a linux laptop (600 USD lenovo) and stopped using my macbook (m1 16" pro).
    Speakers, touchpad and battery life are inferior. Speakers are OK after installing EasyEffects and I don't use the touchpad while programming. And battery life is close enough
    Cachyos with KDE is 10x better than MacOS. So it doesn't make sense to use macbooks for programming anymore IMO.
    You can't even see the update download speed or progress percentage on MacOS, and have to approve 3 times to run a downloaded program, brew is terrible in terms of performance etc. etc. etc.
    eru · 1791157549 · focus · HN ↗
    Interesting. Why do you call out KDE? Does it add to the experience specifically for you?
    I usually use XMonad, but then I nearly do everything in the command line, and I don't like to move my windows around via mouse. (Though XMonad supports that, too.)
    XMonad works for me, but I wouldn't call it out specifically as contributing to the experience.
    > You can't even see the update download speed or progress percentage on MacOS, [...]
    What program are you talking about? You can customise eg Firefox on Mac, just like anywhere else, with extensions to look however you want.
    > [...] brew is terrible in terms of performance [...]
    I'm trying to fix at least brew's Python performance a bit:
    <a href="https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/158283" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/158283
    throooooo · 1791158898 · focus · HN ↗
    I used to use XMonad (now on Hyprland) and feel that the tiling window manager experience you can get on Linux doesn't have an equivalent on macos. KDE is solid but yeah it's plain jane.
    uolmir · 1791165927 · focus · HN ↗
    Aerospace is very good. I'm not some tiling pro but it's been working perfectly for me for a year or so. Such an improvement over just using spaces on macos.
    ozgrakkurt · 1791159653 · focus · HN ↗
    I have been using KDE for 4-5 years on desktop by now and didn't have any big issues with it so far. I was able to solve every single issue I had with it using a web search or an LLM in a couple minutes.
    Only major issue I had was because of cachyos (I think) or just some LLM commands I ran that broke my sound output so I had to reinstall the OS. I probably had more but was using other OS like EndeavorOS/Manjaro before and don't think it was related to KDE.
    Also I just like the UI of it and can find any setting I want easily.
    > What program are you talking about? You can customise eg Firefox on Mac, just like anywhere else, with extensions to look however you want.
    I mean the Software Update thing that updates the OS itself. I also had issues like ghost updates for xcode tools with it (updates come even after I uninstall xcode tools).
    > I'm trying to fix at least brew's Python performance a bit:
    Nice!
    throooooo · 1791160247 · focus · HN ↗
    For the future, it shouldn't be necessary to reinstall Linux just to fix a sound card. Pipewire et. al are a bit of a mess and sprinkle config files in /etc and your home dir. If it happens again start with deleting those and doing a restart.
    ijustlovemath · 1791157961 · focus · HN ↗
    Battery life optimization on Lenovos often involves installing and activating the correct GPU kernel module. My battery life on my P53 improved measurably after doing this, though installing new kernels involved a small build step. Are you just running with all the defaults?
    ozgrakkurt · 1791159377 · focus · HN ↗
    I just installed cachyos normally and didn't do any tweak for GPU. The laptop just has an amd CPU and doesn't have a GPU. Do need a specific GPU kernel module for this?
    dunder_cat · 1791162292 · focus · HN ↗
    With AMD, most GPUs including the integrated ones will just default to the `amdgpu` module which is maintained by AMD themselves. You pretty much have the best possible experience on Linux right now.
    I can't speak from personal experience since my only laptop is an Intel Framework 13 with no dGPU, but there'll be two other main cases both involving Nvidia that tend to bite people.
    1. "Gaming" laptops usually with integrated Intel GPU + Nvidia discrete GPU. Not sure what advancements have been made in power management, there. I know there's some incantations one can put in .desktop files to prefer the discrete GPU for like, games, but not much more I can speak to. 2. General fun involving the fact that Nvidia's "gold-standard" drivers are not mainlined in the kernel, but maybe the fact that they are "open source"* means at some point there'll be parity with them. I think that is the goal of Red Hat's Nova driver in development.
    * these days, the GPUs got complicated enough they have management processors on them that can actually run most of the complicated algorithms via a firmware blob. So the current open-source drivers basically bridge the gap between the kernel's various subsystems and that little processor to work the magic.
    On another note, Intel Xe/i915 have been pretty good, I've used both for integrated GPUs and an Arc Alchemist-generation discrete card of theirs. The framework 13 12th gen intel GPU struggled at the start with a lot of hangs but within a few months of launch, some smart cookies at Intel managed to fix various bugs and it was smooth sailing from there, with the exception of thermals just being in a rough spot on that generation.
    II2II · 1791158469 · focus · HN ↗
    > Speakers, touchpad and battery life are inferior.
    I suppose it depends upon the model, but I find my Lenovo Yoga's touchpad vastly superior to my MacBook Pro's touchpad. Tracking is fine on both, yet I'm having trouble trouble with the MacBook Pro consistently handling clicks. Granted, that is probably a software thing. As an added bonus, the Yoga has a touch screen which folds back, both of which are nice to have. (Agreed on the Mac speakers being significantly better though.)
    > Cachyos with KDE is 10x better than MacOS.
    That is subjective. I definitely agree with you, but a lot of people won't. Then again, I have been using Linux for about 30 years so modern macOS feels limiting and there is very little I can do about it.
    flkiwi · 1791159357 · focus · HN ↗
    I use both macOS and Linux (NixOS + gnome/niri) regularly. When everything is working properly--and, to be clear, I'm talking about the macOS side--I see almost no difference between the two operating systems. I'm on a ThinkPad on one side and an M2 Macbook Pro on the other. The only meaningful difference not attributable to something like different screen size is that Apple displays are damn good, and their speakers are otherworldly.
    I was running Asahi/NixOS on a Macbook Air for a long time, and that experience was also top notch--only battery life was a few percentage points worse on NixOS--but the aarch64 software situation and emulation experience were just not there. I expect they've improved a bit since.
    If someone would make a quality laptop that doesn't look like a Honda street racer and has excellent audio, I'd be very happy.
    torben-friis · 1791159748 · focus · HN ↗
    Same here, only switching to a desktop.
    The single thing I had in macOS I can't replicate in Linux is Preview. Other than that, literally everything is better on this side. I expected to have a bad adaptation period, but the experience has truly caught up.
    coldpie · 1791161775 · focus · HN ↗
    Just curious, what distro & DE did you choose? I'm always looking for a friendly distro to recommend to people.
    ziiinq · 1791178562 · focus · HN ↗
    [dead]
  2. Pesthuf · 1791154272 · focus · HN ↗
    Or a server version. I have an M1 Mac mini as my home server and it really feels like I'm fighting the fact that it's a desktop OS with a GUI and full of components that really, really, really can't deal with being run on a headless system. Not much fun when your super efficient ARM processor suddenly uses 100% CPU for 6 days straight because WindowServer and CoreAudio are having a panic attack due to being unable to find any outputs.
    And so much useless crap you can't turn off without disabling SIP, which it doesn't feel like you're meant to, because who knows what daemon will bring down the entire system when another it expects to be there isn't…
    Marsymars · 1791176360 · focus · HN ↗
    > Or a server version. I have an M1 Mac mini as my home server and it really feels like I'm fighting the fact that it's a desktop OS with a GUI and full of components that really, really, really can't deal with being run on a headless system. Not much fun when your super efficient ARM processor suddenly uses 100% CPU for 6 days straight because WindowServer and CoreAudio are having a panic attack due to being unable to find any outputs.
    In theory I'd prefer a MacBook Neo as a Plex server over my current cheapo Acer laptop with an Alder Lake-N CPU, for lower power draw and better hardware encoding, but in practice, I don't really want to try that with macOS instead of Debian.
  3. etatester · 1791179726 · focus · HN ↗
    Sorry where's the rubble? The OS is pretty thin feature-wise. It's not like certain other OS that literally ship with ads and third-party games.
6. ant6n · 1791152617 · focus · HN ↗
  We have arrived at the Windows Vista era for Mac OS.
  1. penskymaterial · 1791153255 · focus · HN ↗
    Vista had an undeserved bad rep IMO, it was an important 1.0 milestone for many new technologies and improvements especially in the security model.
    Windows 11 still ships with the installer from Vista.
    [deleted] · 1791162543 · focus · HN ↗
    [deleted]
    Marsymars · 1791176841 · focus · HN ↗
    Vista was especially good if you had high-memory-use workloads. Vista 64-bit was miles better than XP x64 Edition.
7. samudrijan · 1791155372 · focus · HN ↗
  Looking at you Logic Pro.
8. nunez · 1791156839 · focus · HN ↗
  Windows is a little worse since there is so much more enshittification to disable, but, yeah, _sigh_.
9. cma · 1791158490 · focus · HN ↗
  I remember the OSX animated wallpaper update (that updated lighting as the time of day changed or something) eating up like 10-15% of my macbook air's small drive. After removal they would re-add themselves every update as important protected system files.
10. mrtksn · 1791159273 · focus · HN ↗
  Maybe this just how winning looks like? Apple won but still needs to keep increasing the profits and the stock price. We can expect enshittification to follow since Apple already did exceptionally well with their products therefore the only way forward is to milk users harder and hype the stock with the latest trends. Every winner must walk this path, nothing to do with Apple and that’s why it looks similar to previous winners.
  1. tavavex · 1791159706 · focus · HN ↗
    I think this applies across the industry. All the easy innovations have been innovated, most people own a computer or several, and they get what they want out of it. Enshittification is desperation - businesses can't accept ups and downs, they only need ups, forever. So they will go to increasingly desperate lengths to juice more profits out of the same customer base and dress themselves up to the investors to show that they still got it. We can safely expect most big publicly traded tech companies to go this way earlier or later.
11. ChickadeeBandit · 1791159530 · focus · HN ↗
  And now the war that we'll get in to as they enforce keeping the cruft and then the tools to remove it.
12. GeekyBear · 1791159533 · focus · HN ↗
  To be like Windows, Apple would have to constantly change the OS so that the workarounds no longer function.
  How many times did users find a way to enable local user accounts on Windows, only to have Microsoft force online accounts on them again?
13. frollogaston · 1791162695 · focus · HN ↗
  It'd be nice if the same tool would delete all the emojis past v1 as well
14. FlowingRiver · 1791167793 · focus · HN ↗
  Apple is going down the same path as Microsoft only at a slower pace and a decade behind. I fear they will turn OSX into something like Win 11 but with slightly better design in the next decade.
  I also realized that I still call it OSX even though it is macOS nowadays.
  1. weird-eye-issue · 1791168630 · focus · HN ↗
    Ever since Snow Leopard it's been downhill
  2. paul7986 · 1791169614 · focus · HN ↗
    Apple Intelligence and even more so Siri isnt worth the disk space. Regular user of chatGPT's Voice/Conversational AI (while driving) and comparably the new Siri is training wheels Voice AI. You can not have a seamless, back and forth conversation with it, so I wont call it Conversational AI.
    Now you may ask who talks to AI? Well this dork does in time I bet more will. Especially, for giving me directions like "That new sub shop is across the street to your favorite McDonalds." No need to fiddle with a phone or look at a screen just drive to a familiar place. I believe, talking to AI is safer while driving then us on our phones or messing with screens.
    Marsymars · 1791176652 · focus · HN ↗
    > Now you may ask who talks to AI? Well this dork does in time I bet more will. Especially, for giving me directions like "That new sub shop is across the street from your favorite McDonalds." No need to fiddle with a phone or look at a screen just drive to a familiar place. I believe talking to AI is safer while driving then us on our phones or messing with screens.
    I've been driving for some decades, and probably still have some decades remaining, and these are just never scenarios I've needed, or will ever need. When I get in my car, if I don't know how to get to my destination, I set it on my nav, and then I drive there. My phone stays in my pocket. I never need to use my phone or mess with my screen.
  3. whycome · 1791170589 · focus · HN ↗
    macos seems weird anyway.
Noaidi · 1791150757 · focus · HN ↗
Have three screenshots on my iPhone taken two weeks apart. I have one point Apple Intelligence, while it’s turned off mind you, takes up four gigs of space, then it disappeared, and now it’s back to four gigs again. Can someone please explain this to me?
rsx88 · 1791151343 · focus · HN ↗
The enshittification of Apple is going on. Debloating Windows, degoogling Android. MacOS/iOS was still decent a few months ago. And now they've put banners on iPhones, real advertisements trying to force you to subscribe to Apple This, Apple That. And you can't close the banner. Now they remove the option for you to remove the models. And Apple storage space is darn expensive. Now we have to use a 3rd-party tool to debloat Apple's OS too? To hell with that. Is this really the year to go full-time Linux? Steve must be squirming down there with the enshittification of Apple too. Let's shove AI (SI is different stuff, Bozo) down your throats. Jesus Christ. I suppose that's what the board members want. More revenue. Maybe it's time to start parting ways with Apple if they keep it like that. Corporate greed has taken over and user experience has gone down the drain.
1. thenthenthen · 1791157415 · focus · HN ↗
  AI is literally everywhere now. Even my washing powder is ‘AI’. It’s not only ‘the board’, its spread much further. I am not anti-ai, but seriously fatigued
  1. tavavex · 1791160395 · focus · HN ↗
    > Even my washing powder is ‘AI’.
    Would you like to use that in your AI washing machine, which is AI-powered with our smAIrt wAIsh app? It features a helpful chatbot that will tell you helpful things you could never find out before, such as what wash settings to use for your load. Don't forget to download our limited-time AI-optimized wash cycle on the way out! And then you can rest easy, kick back and watch some AI-made content on your AI smart TV while the AI robot vacuum handles another one of your chores. Got any questions? Just contact our helpful AI assistant (human agent service no longer available) and it will help you with all your AI needs.
    The investors were getting nervous, because the tech market was about to stop looking so hot. But now they have a savior. This is what made them collectively go "WE WANT AI!!!!!" This is why every company is now trying to AI-ify itself, no matter how absurd that is. This is just what companies do now. Hopping on the bandwagon is no longer optional. Good, stable companies are worthless if there's an compAIny promising riches because of how AI they are.
  2. saghm · 1791166778 · focus · HN ↗
    My wife and I bought a new washing machine earlier this year, and we ended up picking out a model that's incredibly "dumb"; two analog dials with only a few settings each for water heat and strength of wash, one button for pausing, and one button to start (which can be held to cancel). Compared to the one we had before with like 50 different combinations of settings on a digital display with dozens of different LED lights that I had no clue how to interpret, I absolute love our new monstrosity. It even continues working if it's opened mid load to chuck something else in.
2. m463 · 1791168095 · focus · HN ↗
  actually, apple has had a LOT of nonsense going on for a LONG time.
  of the 693 processes running on my macos machine, I hand picked a bunch (60+) that I think are nonsense, and would probably make my machine run faster and more privately without:
  adprivacyd amsaccountsd amsengagementd analyticsagent appstoreagent ASPCarryLog audioanalyticsd betaenrollmentagent betaenrollmentd businessservicesd cloudphotod CloudTelemetryService com.apple.geod commerce EscrowSecurityAlert feedbackd financed findmybeaconingd findmydeviced findmylocateagent FindMyMacd FindMyWidgetItems FindMyWidgetPeople generativeexperiencesd geoanalyticsd geodMachServiceBridge homeenergyd HomeWidget icloudmailagent inputanalyticsd itunescloudd knowledge-agent knowledgeconstructiond liquiddetectiond mediaanalysisd mobileactivationd nearbyd NewsTag NewsToday2 nfcd online-auth-agent osanalyticshelper PeopleWidget_macOSExtension PerfPowerTelemetryClientRegistrationService proactiveeventtrackerd promotedcontentd rtcreportingd searchpartyd siriknowledged spotlightknowledged StocksWidget studentd swtransparencyd Terminal tipsd triald triald_system UsageTrackingAgent weatherd WeatherWidget WorldClockWidget
Grombobulous · 1791151552 · focus · HN ↗
I no longer have a Mac as I’ve moved over to Linux, but my iOS device leaves me very frustrated that I can no longer disable this AI stuff with a simple toggle.
It seems insane given that Apple’s competitors (Microsoft, Firefox, probably others) moved toward a global AI switch to make the choice easy for their customers.
1. nrvn · 1791157271 · focus · HN ↗
  You can indeed disable it on ios and ipados. Turn off siri and change the language to the one that does not match your phone language and the models will be removed.
  1. Shank · 1791158049 · focus · HN ↗
    This is simply not true. Things like "writing tools" were moved out of the global siri checkbox and enabled by default, and now require you to use screen time content restrictions or modify settings in individual apps to turn off these features.
  2. saghm · 1791165211 · focus · HN ↗
    > change the language to the one that does not match your phone language
    You do realize how ridiculous that is as a "solution", right? It's good if it works, but you can't possibly think that this is anything other than user-hostile
  3. VCFundedGenYer · 1791167273 · focus · HN ↗
    This is objectively false on the 27 OSes.
2. brigandish · 1791160371 · focus · HN ↗
  Stop updating the OS. It gets a tad annoying that not all apps will continue to work, but that's what the web is for.
  1. varenc · 1791161328 · focus · HN ↗
    [delayed]
    incanus77 · 1791162453 · focus · HN ↗
    I recently sold a nine year old iPad running iOS 17 that is still getting security updates (17.7.11 a few months ago). Even iOS 15 (released 2021) got a security update in May.
    varenc · 1791165746 · focus · HN ↗
    [delayed]
    saghm · 1791165852 · focus · HN ↗
    My experience has been that they do provide those updates, but they intentionally make it hard to notice compared to getting the major version updates that are available for the OS. I distinctly remember a new junior engineer out of college joining my team back in maybe 2022, seeing there were security updates, and then not noticing the button saying something like "more updates" to be able to get them without updating to the latest major version of MacOS.
    More recently, at the end of August, by the dates on my screenshots on my work laptop (the only Apple device I use) I took screenshots because I was incredulous of the sheer audacity of the UI shown for updating from MacOS 15.7.7 to 15.7.9 along with, in the words of the update UI, "1 more" update. When I clicked the button to view all of the available updates, it showed three available updates, which were, in order, MacOS 26.6.2 (which was checked), MacOS 15.7.9 (which was unchecked), and Safari 26.6.1 (which was checked). They literally previewed the only update that was not checked despite not even sorting it at the top of the list of updates available to install. I have absolutely no clue what would have happened if I clicked the "Update now" button next to the prompt for 15.7.9 rather than the identically-styled-to-non-link-element text for viewing the full set of updates, but at absolute best it would have just done something entirely different than what I'd get from the default options when viewing the expanded list, and it seems far more likely that it would have just also done the default options of the expanded view and updated to a completely different version that it put next to the update button.
    odo1242 · 1791168624 · focus · HN ↗
    on MacOS they provide security fixes for two years for unsupported OSes (after that the only remaining security protection is Gatekeeper/Notarization). On iOS you generally get no security fixes unless the vulnerability is really bad
    Marsymars · 1791177596 · focus · HN ↗
    AFAIK Apple has no published policy. Their last several macOS releases have received 3 years of security fixes.
    iOS now seems to get 5 years of security updates, but only for devices that can't upgrade to newer iOS versions - so iOS versions that don't strand any devices get cut off early. e.g. iOS 15 received 3 updates in 2026, but iOS 17 hasn't been updated since 2025.
  2. frollogaston · 1791162642 · focus · HN ↗
    Yeah, this is very clearly the 1-3 years of updates you have to just skip while they figure it out. Like the Touch Bar.
_pdp_ · 1791151663 · focus · HN ↗
I don't understand why you would want to remove well-balanced and relatively small local-inference models that ship with every mac.
Sure, not frontier levels but fine for basic tasks and they are off-the-cloud.
1. dbetteridge · 1791151861 · focus · HN ↗
  Even if you don't want to personally remove them, it should be easy and front and centre to do so.
  It's my disk space, processing power and electricity. Apple shouldn't get to use it as they please
2. PhageGenerator · 1791151924 · focus · HN ↗
  The point is that it downloads a multi-gig model automatically without providing an easy way to reclaim that storage space if you don't intend to use that feature.
  This is very much an anti-user behavior. Certainly having models run on-device is preferred when possible, but if you don't want to use the Apple Intelligence this is an anti-feature. Especially on devices with small storage capacities which are impacted the most by this.
  1. Daz912 · 1791160932 · focus · HN ↗
    [dead]
3. zanderwohl · 1791152419 · focus · HN ↗
  Because the Macbook Air still comes with only 512 GB of SSD in its default config. A feature that you rarely use probably isn't worth even 1/50th of your meager storage.
  1. Gigachad · 1791168214 · focus · HN ↗
    The neo comes with 256gb, which would be fine if they used it sparingly, I don't have any issue with this much storage on my phone, but on macos the space just gets eaten up by junk and is hard to manage.
4. causesothere · 1791152455 · focus · HN ↗
  Here are a few reasons someone would want that. You might not value them the same, but that does not make them wrong.
  1) They have issues with the ways these models were trained. They may consider it unethical to use models trained on what they consider plagiarized material or on material that used a lot of energy for training.
  2) They may have higher value uses of the storage space and compute resource.
  3) They may view installation of apps and features without consent to be an infringement on running their device the way they would like.
  4) They may find the general technology and its impact on society to be concerning, anxiety inducing, frustrating, or irritating. And simply not want to participate.
  5) They think it sucks. Like, out just doesn't work or doesn't help them.
5. tiborsaas · 1791154266 · focus · HN ↗
  That's why: <a href="https://imgur.com/a/1vaUMi5" rel="nofollow">https://imgur.com/a/1vaUMi5
  Let me juggle juggle with the small space I have the way I want.
6. Crontab · 1791154661 · focus · HN ↗
  I don't want AI, at all, and especially not on my operating system. I am leaving my Macbook Pro at version 26 and will not update to 27 until there is some kind of master off switch. If that is not provided by Apple by the time I am ready to replace my computer than I will be going the open source route.
  I am personally tired of Apple and Microsoft fattening up operating systems.
7. seam_carver · 1791156601 · focus · HN ↗
  Because Apple still sells 256 gb base models like the m6 Mac mini
8. nunez · 1791157081 · focus · HN ↗
  Because I don't like features being shoved down my throat. I'd be much more willing to try the stuff if they gave me control over when I do so *like they did in the last version of macOS!*
  Apple did the same thing with watchOS by the way. They forced a stupid new quick actions menu that always pops up before getting to the all apps screen and removed the app switcher. if you want to terminate non-working apps that are prone to not working, like Apple Music, the solution now is "well, tough shit."
9. _nothing · 1791157211 · focus · HN ↗
  I don't use and don't want to use any feature that is listed there. I don't use Siri on my Macbook, I don't need writing tools run on every single thing I write, I hate text predictions, I don't want summaries on the content I want to read, I don't need models analyzing my photos in the background.
  In fact I don't want models doing anything in the background that I didn't explicitly ask them to do.
  1. dominotw · 1791165393 · focus · HN ↗
    i am looking forward to building safari extensions by typing words
10. ruhrohraggy · 1791158737 · focus · HN ↗
  [dead]
11. dawnerd · 1791163572 · focus · HN ↗
  I don’t know why pro AI people have such a hard time understanding consent.
  1. senordevnyc · 1791165931 · focus · HN ↗
    Did you consent to every other feature of macOS, the many thousands of them?
    This has nothing to do with consent. A product you use is going in a different direction than your personal preference. Nothing new here.
    saghm · 1791166379 · focus · HN ↗
    Intentionally eliminating a choice that they used to provide that many people would still like the ability to choose is not a new phenomenon, you're correct. That doesn't make it any less user hostile when it happens though, and I think plenty of people don't think "well plenty of other sucky things happen in similar ways" to be a good reason not to be upset when a new unnecessary sucky thing happens.
  2. dwaite · 1791175002 · focus · HN ↗
    What is the consent line being drawn here? From handwriting recognition and mail filtering from back in 2002, face detection in iPhoto back in 2009, text to speech and Siri, dictation, NLP, text to speech, the vision framework, and Core ML are all examples of AI/ML tech that have shipped at some point standard on new Macs long before Golden Gate.
12. saghm · 1791166177 · focus · HN ↗
  Because I could use the same space (12 GB, not something I'd consider "relatively small" on my work laptop with only 500 GB) for things that I actually use? I don't have any need for basic off-cloud AI tasks.
13. VCFundedGenYer · 1791167376 · focus · HN ↗
  Because a 256GB Mac Mini literally cannot function with this garbage installed. There isn’t enough disk space.
14. redox99 · 1791173283 · focus · HN ↗
  I love local models, but the AFM advanced or whatever its called (the 20B local one) sucks. And it's not really used in MacOS outside of "fm" and very niche stuff. Siri is always cloud even if you're offline.
15. qn8bdebq · 1791176226 · focus · HN ↗
  If you don't have a 256 gig mac, you'll never realize how scarce the space is.
  If they wanna fill roughly 10% of your usable space with stuff you don't really use, with option to remove, you'd be mad too.
1saadcodes · 1791151949 · focus · HN ↗
It's nice that the tool is open source tool. You can actually see what it's doing and not end up downloading something sketchy
What worries me is that Apple might to be heading in a bit of a bloatware direction with this stuff. Having to give up tens of GB of storage for an AI model that I may not even use feels pretty far from the old Apple approach of keeping the OS lean
trackofalljades · 1791153089 · focus · HN ↗
Does anything like this exist for iOS, if you wanna nuke some AI crap you have no desire for and get some space back? My notebook is fine but my phone is painfully tight on storage.
1. ajdude · 1791165913 · focus · HN ↗
  I'm trying to find this myself. Since I upgraded to the latest version of iOS, I have found no way to disable these stupid writing tools. Whenever I try to take a screenshot, the AI tries to give me suggestions on what to do with the photo before I can properly crop it, and speech to text continues to insert grammar into the output after removing the toggle that disables the auto insertion of grammar (it also seems worse now).
  My guess is that we need some tailored configuration profile that will run on the device, which seems to be how this project solved it for macOS.
Waterluvian · 1791153203 · focus · HN ↗
I remember 15+ years ago having to remove gigabytes of printer drivers from OSX. This was at a time where “drivers” were a whole, horribly frustrating thing and Apple wanted stuff to “just work.”
Lots of opinions for sure, but I’m curious how Apple actually tries to decide the cost-benefit of these kinds of things. Obviously they know they need added disk usage and some people will be upset. Do they have a model to estimate or do they just A/B test and see how it goes?
1. grvbck · 1791158428 · focus · HN ↗
  And language packs for 30 languages one would never use!
2. saghm · 1791166444 · focus · HN ↗
  I have no trouble imagining real-world users being incredibly frustrated when printers don't work out of the box. I have a lot of trouble imagining real-world users being frustrated because Apple left in a checkbox that let them reclaim the disk space for an unwanted feature that existed in the previous version of the OS.
smallstepforman · 1791153209 · focus · HN ↗
Ah yes, more enshitification. The other day Visual Studio 2026 brought in a mandatory update, lots of CoPilot stuff I didnt ask for, but they broke code search so finding who uses a structure is now harder to find. No way to revert to older version of VS2026.
pmarreck · 1791154463 · focus · HN ↗
What does it actually do?
1. RGS1811 · 1791158685 · focus · HN ↗
  It analyzes your text messages and tells you to say "lolol" back to people a lot. Also it periodically swamps the GPU in order to analyze all your photos.
kristianpaul · 1791156530 · focus · HN ↗
I need 12 GB back
evergreenokada · 1791163356 · focus · HN ↗
Honestly, I could do without Spotlight too. Just let me turn off the stuff I don’t use
mung · 1791166368 · focus · HN ↗
I think the problem isn't the AI, it's the ridiculously small SSDs you can get on Apple products that make one quibble about 12GB in 2026.
1. Gigachad · 1791168116 · focus · HN ↗
  It's so hard to manage storage space on mac as well. Every app leaves massive amounts of crap in deep system directories that are hard to find and persist after you delete the app. My 512gb mac is always running out of space so I have to use 3rd party tools to find where all the space went since macos just lumps it in "Applications" or "Documents" with no real way to see anything.
2. FlowingRiver · 1791168507 · focus · HN ↗
  It feels like so much software was just anticipating storage to keep getting cheaper and processors to keep increasing in performance forever. Now that we have hit a significant road block on that path, we are seeing the big disconnect.
  I realized that in 2005 my work station was a fully decked out Dual 2Ghz G5 Powermac that had 8GB of RAM. Yes, that was OBSCENE at the time but it was being used for generating light maps on 3D scenes and we were going to use all the memory we could get and 64bit processors with their memory addressing was a nice to have.
  That there are new laptops and even desktop that still come with 8GB some 21 years later, who could have seen that coming? It would be like selling a PC in 2005 with 2MB of RAM.
  1. incognition · 1791175462 · focus · HN ↗
    yes, it's totally bizarre. And RAM used to be a commodity, well sort of prior to the past two years. It definitely didn't drive the bulk of the bill of materials, however manufacturers honed in on it as a way of segmenting the market.
3. otterley · 1791176844 · focus · HN ↗
  Which models? MacBook Pros start out at 1TB nowadays.
4. sdcfgy · 1791178965 · focus · HN ↗
  It's also the ridiculous cost of the upgrades. I recently purchased an entire (second hand) PC with a Xeon, 16Gb RAM and 1TB NVMe in it for 5% less than the cost of the 256 to 512Gb upgrade.
sgammon · 1791167351 · focus · HN ↗
Wow. 12gb?! Huge. That’s almost one tenth of another worktree’s rust target dir!
wrong_answers · 1791167525 · focus · HN ↗
So many crybabies. It’s “No wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame.” levels of disconnect from what the average consumer actually wants
1. mahboi · 1791167633 · focus · HN ↗
  Average consumer wants disk to not be full
  1. armadyl · 1791172679 · focus · HN ↗
    The average consumer of Apple products 100% does not care about this, it’s only an “issue” in hyper niche places like here. In the real world the average user doesn’t care or notice or more likely uses Apples Intelligence features.
    This whole thread is made up of people living in a bubble.
    mahboi · 1791180663 · focus · HN ↗
    The bubble is people watching every GB or MB. Regular people run out of space, go to the storage manager, and wonder why "system" is so big. Ask my wife about her two laptops and phone.
2. gfaure · 1791167862 · focus · HN ↗
  In my opinion, rising storage costs make it even less excusable that opt-out is not even an option.
mahboi · 1791167612 · focus · HN ↗
I wanted Snow Tahoe.
thallavajhula · 1791167700 · focus · HN ↗
The fact that tools like these exist show how bad the AI integration is. It's outdated and does nothing helpful really. There's a ton of other AI providers that offer more powerful features. The AI integration in Google devices is miles ahead of Siri. This has always been the case. iOS and macOS have terrible Siri features. I've been a believer in Apple for a really long time. I've been using Siri even before Apple acquired them. I've used it for long enough and this year has been the final nail in the coffin. I give up. I can't wait for Apple to "finally" make it better. It's not happening.
1. pprotas · 1791178662 · focus · HN ↗
  For years people have been begging Apple to make Siri respond to basic requests, and Siri could not do it. Now the technology that allows them to fix Siri is handed to them on a silver platter, yet they still mess it up.
zamalek · 1791175893 · focus · HN ↗
So macOS has debloat scripts now too?
Still heard from 2026 despite that: <something something> Linux is only free if your time is free.
aiXis · 1791178257 · focus · HN ↗
[dead]

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.