‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Burning Man death rates – A short lesson in statistics

179 points · 243 comments · viraj_shah

  1. michael1999 · · focus · HN ↗
    Some of this is selection bias, but lots of this is active work by the organizers.

    Burning Man has slowly re-created the regulatory state in response to the standard pressures of civilization. To their credit, this has often been in response to near-misses, but sometimes in response to fatalities. It started with sanitation (potties), and banning guns/explosives. You can have 100 people shooting guns at a party in the desert without sanitation and muddle through. At 10k, you are building a cholera-mad-max experiment. A car running over a sleeping person prompted a designated road network. And then they adopted zoning, with hush-ville and the large sound installation ends. All supported by the ranger team preventing injury every day. Civilization is work.

    1. poulpy123 · · focus · HN ↗
      Kinda insane they needed a death to reinvent streets imho.
      1. xboxnolifes · · focus · HN ↗
        It's not insane, and it was just explained how it happens. You don't need streets when you have 10 people. Or 100 people. But there comes a threshold where you do need them. The question remains, how do you recognize or determine this threshold? A lot of the times, a death is the wake up call.
        1. bmitc · · focus · HN ↗
          It seems like you need a road as soon as cars and people mix, does it not?
          1. s1artibartfast · · focus · HN ↗
            Yet you can go many so many places where that is not the case. It also takes people to build and designate them
            1. rightnutwingjob · · focus · HN ↗
              Show me one example where people and cars use a shared space that isn’t also a road. Or a street, or boulevard, or whatever.
              1. s1artibartfast · · focus · HN ↗
                Basically anywhere you have dispersal car camping, of which salt flats are one example, even without burning man.

                Also drive on beaches would be a good example.

              2. cromulent · · focus · HN ↗
                Depends on the definition of "whatever" but car parks come to mind.

                In Finland there are specific signposted pedestrian zones, where cars may enter but must not exceed 20kmh and must give priority to pedestrians (as must cyclists). They are typically the areas surrounding apartment building entranceways.

              3. tetromino_ · · focus · HN ↗
                Suburban driveways are the obvious example. Adults park on them, kids play on them.
              4. michael1999 · · focus · HN ↗
                The internals of Barcelona super-blocks are mixed spaces, with cars expected to stay under 5km/h (i.e. ride the brakes and feather the clutch) at all times. Many old-city areas are primarily pedestrian with cars allowed as 2nd-class visitors. Agree that this is rare in the USA.
            2. bmitc · · focus · HN ↗
              > It also takes people to build and designate them reply

              If by them you mean roads, then yea, that's the point.

              1. s1artibartfast · · focus · HN ↗
                Sure. So you can commit to going nowhere without roads, or be willing to drive and camp places without them.

                You can do a lot without designated and built roads, as buring man up to that point obviously demonstrated. If it wasn't constantly growing, they probably could have gone several years without another death

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.