Some of this is selection bias, but lots of this is active work by the organizers.
Burning Man has slowly re-created the regulatory state in response to the standard pressures of civilization. To their credit, this has often been in response to near-misses, but sometimes in response to fatalities. It started with sanitation (potties), and banning guns/explosives. You can have 100 people shooting guns at a party in the desert without sanitation and muddle through. At 10k, you are building a cholera-mad-max experiment. A car running over a sleeping person prompted a designated road network. And then they adopted zoning, with hush-ville and the large sound installation ends. All supported by the ranger team preventing injury every day. Civilization is work.
No, this one is written in foolishness because anyone with common sense would have known better. The entire ethos of that place was to reject that kind of thinking and build their own world. Real smart stuff.
It's not insane, and it was just explained how it happens. You don't need streets when you have 10 people. Or 100 people. But there comes a threshold where you do need them. The question remains, how do you recognize or determine this threshold? A lot of the times, a death is the wake up call.
Depends on the definition of "whatever" but car parks come to mind.
In Finland there are specific signposted pedestrian zones, where cars may enter but must not exceed 20kmh and must give priority to pedestrians (as must cyclists). They are typically the areas surrounding apartment building entranceways.
The internals of Barcelona super-blocks are mixed spaces, with cars expected to stay under 5km/h (i.e. ride the brakes and feather the clutch) at all times. Many old-city areas are primarily pedestrian with cars allowed as 2nd-class visitors. Agree that this is rare in the USA.
Sure. So you can commit to going nowhere without roads, or be willing to drive and camp places without them.
You can do a lot without designated and built roads, as buring man up to that point obviously demonstrated. If it wasn't constantly growing, they probably could have gone several years without another death
Burning Man was 10 or 30 people when someone ran over someone else sleeping?
Offroading, unless it's on sand dunes, generally has paths (i.e., roads), either official or well-trodden ones, that people drive on. Are people sleeping on these paths or in the middle of the sand dunes?
I thought Burning Man was full of "smart" people?
In the early days, people showed up and just camped wherever. Also, people just drove whenever. For the most part, it worked, until it didn't. When things are unsafe, people are more careful. Norway and Sweden deliberately made their roads less safe to take advantage of this.
There are no stop signs at intersections at Burning Man and thousands of cyclists and yet there are very few collisions. Why? Everyone has to pay attention.
Eventually though, drugs, drinking, driving and tents randomly placed around the open lake bed lead to disaster and they had to add roads. This helped in other ways too. It meant that emergency services could find people who needed help. I also meant that it was easier to describe where your tent was to your friends, or find your way back to camp.
> Norway and Sweden deliberately made their roads less safe to take advantage of this.
All over Europe you see "horizontal speed bumps": deliberate road constrictions that funnel you into oncoming traffic. To an American it looks crazy but it works.
Regular speed bumps won't funnel you into oncoming traffic, are you talking about something different? Searching for "horizontal" specifically didn't yield anything distinct.
I think they’re referring to a curb extension or “neckdown.” It takes a street with 2-way traffic and adds a mid-block choke point so only one car can go through at a time.
Here in the UK, people (often in a particular age demographic) often mock "Health and Safety". "Hahaha got a high vis jacket on if you're opening that can of coke? Hahahahaha"
Fuck off with that. It's actually important, and the HSE website has a lot of case studies explaining why.
For example you are absolutely not under any circumstances allowed to bring matches or cigarette lighters onto oil or gas related sites. You'd think that would be pretty reasonable, right? There's even a a smoking shelter with special lighters attached to the wall so people can smoke, well away from the explodey stuff. But no, "OMG 'elf an' safety gone mad innit?"
Does anyone want to know *why* matches and lighters are banned? Anyone care to take a guess as to whether or not there was a specific incident leading up to the ban?
Okay then, here it is: <a href="https://www.hse.gov.uk/comah/sragtech/casebpdalment87.htm" rel="nofollow">https://www.hse.gov.uk/comah/sragtech/casebpdalment87.htm
Read the fourth paragraph a couple of times until it sinks in properly.
A colleague of mine sometimes has described some people as "A case study waiting to happen".
There was a comment somewhere - here? - that the default mode of human experience isn't "Successfully predict the future to avoid problems," it's "FAFO."
Also, everyone makes mistakes. But some people are, quite literally, a danger to themselves and others, and everyone needs to be protected from them. Including themselves.
Do you need a death to enforce car/people separation for every new festival ?
There have been festivals for a long time, and we get 150 years of experience with cars. It has been obvious for decade that you don't mix both, especially when drugs and alcohol are involved.
I have been to campings for decades and all of them have road/streets for cars despite having less people and less money than burning man.
michael1999 · · focus · HN ↗
Burning Man has slowly re-created the regulatory state in response to the standard pressures of civilization. To their credit, this has often been in response to near-misses, but sometimes in response to fatalities. It started with sanitation (potties), and banning guns/explosives. You can have 100 people shooting guns at a party in the desert without sanitation and muddle through. At 10k, you are building a cholera-mad-max experiment. A car running over a sleeping person prompted a designated road network. And then they adopted zoning, with hush-ville and the large sound installation ends. All supported by the ranger team preventing injury every day. Civilization is work.
poulpy123 · · focus · HN ↗
dsr_ · · focus · HN ↗
freejazz · · focus · HN ↗
TeMPOraL · · focus · HN ↗
freejazz · · focus · HN ↗
fragmede · · focus · HN ↗
xboxnolifes · · focus · HN ↗
bmitc · · focus · HN ↗
s1artibartfast · · focus · HN ↗
rightnutwingjob · · focus · HN ↗
s1artibartfast · · focus · HN ↗
Also drive on beaches would be a good example.
cromulent · · focus · HN ↗
In Finland there are specific signposted pedestrian zones, where cars may enter but must not exceed 20kmh and must give priority to pedestrians (as must cyclists). They are typically the areas surrounding apartment building entranceways.
tetromino_ · · focus · HN ↗
michael1999 · · focus · HN ↗
bmitc · · focus · HN ↗
If by them you mean roads, then yea, that's the point.
s1artibartfast · · focus · HN ↗
You can do a lot without designated and built roads, as buring man up to that point obviously demonstrated. If it wasn't constantly growing, they probably could have gone several years without another death
xboxnolifes · · focus · HN ↗
bmitc · · focus · HN ↗
Offroading, unless it's on sand dunes, generally has paths (i.e., roads), either official or well-trodden ones, that people drive on. Are people sleeping on these paths or in the middle of the sand dunes?
I thought Burning Man was full of "smart" people?
jonahhorowitz · · focus · HN ↗
There are no stop signs at intersections at Burning Man and thousands of cyclists and yet there are very few collisions. Why? Everyone has to pay attention.
Eventually though, drugs, drinking, driving and tents randomly placed around the open lake bed lead to disaster and they had to add roads. This helped in other ways too. It meant that emergency services could find people who needed help. I also meant that it was easier to describe where your tent was to your friends, or find your way back to camp.
dguest · · focus · HN ↗
All over Europe you see "horizontal speed bumps": deliberate road constrictions that funnel you into oncoming traffic. To an American it looks crazy but it works.
cleartext412 · · focus · HN ↗
jonahhorowitz · · focus · HN ↗
- <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curb_extension" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curb_extension
dguest · · focus · HN ↗
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicane" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicane
bmitc · · focus · HN ↗
ErroneousBosh · · focus · HN ↗
You'd be surprised how *really* *fucking* *stupid* "smart people" are.
Even you. Even me.
[deleted] · · focus · HN ↗
[deleted]
poulpy123 · · focus · HN ↗
bandrami · · focus · HN ↗
ErroneousBosh · · focus · HN ↗
Fuck off with that. It's actually important, and the HSE website has a lot of case studies explaining why.
For example you are absolutely not under any circumstances allowed to bring matches or cigarette lighters onto oil or gas related sites. You'd think that would be pretty reasonable, right? There's even a a smoking shelter with special lighters attached to the wall so people can smoke, well away from the explodey stuff. But no, "OMG 'elf an' safety gone mad innit?"
Does anyone want to know *why* matches and lighters are banned? Anyone care to take a guess as to whether or not there was a specific incident leading up to the ban?
Okay then, here it is: <a href="https://www.hse.gov.uk/comah/sragtech/casebpdalment87.htm" rel="nofollow">https://www.hse.gov.uk/comah/sragtech/casebpdalment87.htm
Read the fourth paragraph a couple of times until it sinks in properly.
A colleague of mine sometimes has described some people as "A case study waiting to happen".
TheOtherHobbes · · focus · HN ↗
Also, everyone makes mistakes. But some people are, quite literally, a danger to themselves and others, and everyone needs to be protected from them. Including themselves.
ErroneousBosh · · focus · HN ↗
poulpy123 · · focus · HN ↗
I have been to campings for decades and all of them have road/streets for cars despite having less people and less money than burning man.
flomo · · focus · HN ↗