Thread

1. SuperV1234 · 1791126129 · focus · HN ↗

   We're getting closer and closer to the day we can have an Opus-like model running locally. The dream!

   1. stymaar · 1791127600 · focus · HN ↗

      It depends on what you mean by “Opus-like”, because if you mean “as strong as Opus 4.6 for agentic coding” then Qwen3.8-27B has been there for the past two months.

      But if you mean “as strong as current-gen Opus” then it's probably never gonna happen, but it doesn't really matter since we're long into the diminishing returns for performance improvements: I haven't notice any major leap between 4.6 and 5.5 in my daily usage, and I'm convinced that with a fact enough piecs of hardware I would be using local Qwen exclusively (I'm using it daily but only at night for long running tasks because they take much more time than Opus due to the compounding effects of my slow GPU and Qwen's verbosity).

      1. nycdatasci · 1791129282 · focus · HN ↗

         Opus 5.5 was a step function change. Really crushes on multi-hour coding compared with prior models.

         1. jjcm · 1791134419 · focus · HN ↗

            Highly agree.

            I keep saying “I’d be so Happy with ${currentOpusVersion} locally”, but I keep being impressed with how much the capabilities change between versions. I have a RTX 6000 pro so I can easily run this qwen 3.8 flash next, but it’s much harder to give up the freedom that 5.5 gives me.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.