Run Qwen 3.8 Flash Next (125B) on consumer hardware (RTX 4090) at 100T/s
Thread
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
Run Qwen 3.8 Flash Next (125B) on consumer hardware (RTX 4090) at 100T/s
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
SuperV1234 · · focus · HN ↗
stymaar · · focus · HN ↗
But if you mean “as strong as current-gen Opus” then it's probably never gonna happen, but it doesn't really matter since we're long into the diminishing returns for performance improvements: I haven't notice any major leap between 4.6 and 5.5 in my daily usage, and I'm convinced that with a fact enough piecs of hardware I would be using local Qwen exclusively (I'm using it daily but only at night for long running tasks because they take much more time than Opus due to the compounding effects of my slow GPU and Qwen's verbosity).
nycdatasci · · focus · HN ↗
jjcm · · focus · HN ↗
I keep saying “I’d be so Happy with ${currentOpusVersion} locally”, but I keep being impressed with how much the capabilities change between versions. I have a RTX 6000 pro so I can easily run this qwen 3.8 flash next, but it’s much harder to give up the freedom that 5.5 gives me.
stymaar · · focus · HN ↗
Opus 5.5 just fell like a return to the mean afterwards (it's probably an improvement over the previous versions, but I couldn't really feel it because I've been burned by Opus 5).