IDK why anyone can’t clearly define “AGI” and why they can’t clearly lay out how we get from our current text-generation algorithms to whatever their idea of “AGI” is.
I don't know why anyone thinks "probabilistic" is a meaningful statement about post-trained models. It is true, but it is also irrelevant.
mupuff1234 · · focus · HN ↗
angoragoats · · focus · HN ↗
jeremyjh · · focus · HN ↗
angoragoats · · focus · HN ↗