Thread

1. mupuff1234 · 1791037154 · focus · HN ↗

   Idk why anyone thinks there can be AGI and alignment, seems almost like an oxymoron to me.

   1. angoragoats · 1791037708 · focus · HN ↗

      IDK why anyone can’t clearly define “AGI” and why they can’t clearly lay out how we get from our current text-generation algorithms to whatever their idea of “AGI” is.

      1. iugtmkbdfil834 · 1791037846 · focus · HN ↗

         You see.. this is exactly why our great leader chose to form a new way forward to move us away from the undefined AGI into glorious SI!
      2. jeremyjh · 1791038461 · focus · HN ↗

         I don't know why anyone thinks "probabilistic" is a meaningful statement about post-trained models. It is true, but it is also irrelevant.

         1. angoragoats · 1791056021 · focus · HN ↗

            Thanks, I agree. Since it wasn’t at all relevant to my point, I’ve removed it from my post.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.