‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

ICC judge on what U.S. sanctions mean for her and global courts

229 points · 173 comments · rbanffy

  1. msdz · · focus · HN ↗
    Regardless of what one personally thinks about the ICC, this isn’t a good look for neither the US nor Europe.

    For the U.S., because sanctioning an “unpleasant”, but in essence harmless individual (geopolitically speaking) is ridiculous. Falling victim to de-banking alone can really ruin one’s life.

    And for the EU, because it once again showcases the dependence on U.S. systems for just about anything tech-related in everyday life and work.

    1. MSFT_Edging · · focus · HN ↗
      > Falling victim to de-banking alone

      This is especially ironic given how many Trump supporters had "de-banking" as their main issue.

      IIRC most of them were "debanked" due to crypto fraud or other financial crimes.

      1. throwawayfifo · · focus · HN ↗
        This is doubly "ironic" considering the left was all for debanking right-wing dissenters (Freedom Convoy) when they were in power.
        1. MSFT_Edging · · focus · HN ↗
          What was the "freedom convoy" dissenting from?

          Vaccine mandates, for a virus that was doing multiple 9/11's daily, by a bunch of guys who sit in their trucks all day.

          Change your diaper, dude.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.