I hope they will put more resources into fixing issues.
I remember there were multiple attempts to add it to ClickBench, but each time new bugs were found.
> It was loading the data for a week already, and the speed of loading data has dropped to 4 kilobytes per second, and it will take years to load the dataset.
And then on 2nd of August
> It loaded maybe 1% of the data so far.
And then one year after
> I didn't load the data after a year.
> I tried it with the fsync removed, but even then it does not work
Ok, I find this more entertaining than I should and almost unbelievable. I know that this codebase was heavily written by LLMs but the execution can't be this bad?
What am I missing and why would Supabase buy the product which can't even load the dataset properly?
You're looking at a software project months after its inception, saying it didn't work well then, and then asking why someone would buy it well over a year later...
1st commit of the project was in August 2023 so not quite few months old. And the performance problem according to <a href="https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickBench/pull/1159" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickBench/pull/1159 has not been yet solved.
f311a · · focus · HN ↗
It should not be X times slower than SQLite.
<a href="https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickBench/issues/336" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickBench/issues/336
<a href="https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickBench/pull/1009" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickBench/pull/1009
menaerus · · focus · HN ↗
> It was loading the data for a week already, and the speed of loading data has dropped to 4 kilobytes per second, and it will take years to load the dataset.
And then on 2nd of August
> It loaded maybe 1% of the data so far.
And then one year after
> I didn't load the data after a year. > I tried it with the fsync removed, but even then it does not work
Ok, I find this more entertaining than I should and almost unbelievable. I know that this codebase was heavily written by LLMs but the execution can't be this bad?
What am I missing and why would Supabase buy the product which can't even load the dataset properly?
ambicapter · · focus · HN ↗
gpm · · focus · HN ↗
gpm · · focus · HN ↗
menaerus · · focus · HN ↗
So, I think my curiosity still stands.
gpm · · focus · HN ↗
Yeah, ok, I took the date from [1] but you're right the project did in some sense exist before then.
[1] <a href="https://turso.tech/blog/we-will-rewrite-sqlite-and-we-are-going-all-in" rel="nofollow">https://turso.tech/blog/we-will-rewrite-sqlite-and-we-are-go...