Thread

1. StrauXX · 1790922183 · focus · HN ↗

   I don't see much of a future for these kinds of intricate harnesses, or harnessing in general for that matter. As models are getting better, harnessing will shrink until they are at the level of vanilla Pi or not even that.

   1. throwa356262 · 1790922932 · focus · HN ↗

      On the contrary, I belive this will be the next battlefield.

      My wild theory is that we already have AGI level models, but we are not yet using them correctly.

      1. StrauXX · 1790923193 · focus · HN ↗

         If we had AGI, they could per definition build a harness better than any human could. In such a regime, (human) pre-built harnesses are moot.

         1. 010ED67913 · 1790925835 · focus · HN ↗

            agi is artificial general intelligence. sol5.6, astra, fable are already wildly more intelligent than the average person. we already have agi. however people need to keep the moving target so they have something to talk about, otherwise the voracious appetite for novelty will not be met.

            what we don’t have yet are the tools to take full advantage of the agi we do have. they’re coming soon.

            1. bsenftner · 1790941722 · focus · HN ↗

               AGI is when AI models no longer need any training at all, because they have comprehension, meaning human science finally developed artificial comprehension, which we have not yet. Calling what we have now AGI is sycophant talk.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.