Thread

1. warkdarrior · 1790803732 · focus · HN ↗

   [dead]

   1. warkdarrior · 1790804082 · focus · HN ↗

      And in case anyone is not sure what I am talking about, see this: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;media.defense.gov&#x2F;2022&#x2F;Nov&#x2F;10&#x2F;2003112742&#x2F;-1&#x2F;-1&#x2F;0&#x2F;CSI_SOFTWARE_MEMORY_SAFETY.PDF" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;media.defense.gov&#x2F;2022&#x2F;Nov&#x2F;10&#x2F;2003112742&#x2F;-1&#x2F;-1&#x2F;0&#x2F;CSI...

      1. aesthesia · 1790804573 · focus · HN ↗

         Note that the word &quot;deprecate&quot; appears nowhere in that document.

         1. warkdarrior · 1790804806 · focus · HN ↗

            The wording at the end is quite clear, even if it does not use the exact word &quot;deprecate&quot;:

            &gt; &quot;NSA advises organizations to consider making a strategic shift from programming languages that provide little or no inherent memory protection, such as C&#x2F;C++ and assembly, to a memory safe language when possible.&quot;

            1. aesthesia · 1790805020 · focus · HN ↗

               Deprecation is a speech act. It&#x27;s something that can only occur if you use the word itself.

               1. selimthegrim · 1790817989 · focus · HN ↗

                  Derogate?

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.