And in case anyone is not sure what I am talking about, see this:
<a href="https://media.defense.gov/2022/Nov/10/2003112742/-1/-1/0/CSI_SOFTWARE_MEMORY_SAFETY.PDF" rel="nofollow">https://media.defense.gov/2022/Nov/10/2003112742/-1/-1/0/CSI...
The wording at the end is quite clear, even if it does not use the exact word "deprecate":
> "NSA advises organizations to consider making a strategic shift from
programming languages that provide little or no inherent memory protection, such as C/C++ and assembly, to a memory safe language when possible."
Deprecated or not, there are billions of lines of code out there that use it, and the odds of a random CS graduate encountering it are very, very high. So it makes sense to be familiar with it.
warkdarrior · · focus · HN ↗
[dead]
warkdarrior · · focus · HN ↗
aesthesia · · focus · HN ↗
warkdarrior · · focus · HN ↗
> "NSA advises organizations to consider making a strategic shift from programming languages that provide little or no inherent memory protection, such as C/C++ and assembly, to a memory safe language when possible."
aesthesia · · focus · HN ↗
selimthegrim · · focus · HN ↗
fxwin · · focus · HN ↗
ChickeNES · · focus · HN ↗
compiler-guy · · focus · HN ↗