‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Dots: Always-on agents

767 points · 647 comments · alvis

  1. wxw · · focus · HN ↗
    The lines between Codex, ChatGPT Work, and Dots is getting a bit blurry to me. I think the target should be a remote agent(s) in its own sandbox with long memory, and all three are heading in that direction so why have the distinctions?

    Unless Dots is dramatically more capable than Muse, I'm also more bullish on Muse than Dots. I think Muse is a better consumer play because it can be forever subsidized by Meta ads and find distribution in family of apps while Dots is in a weird place between consumer & professional. From the release, it also sounds like you'll have to pay per Dot at some point which doesn't sound appealing.

    1. TZubiri · · focus · HN ↗
      Remember MyGPT? How about Agent Builder? GPT Pulse? There was also Deep Research mode remember that?

      Anyways, I'm sure this Dots thing will be clearly distinct from the other projects and won't be deprecated within months

      1. famouswaffles · · focus · HN ↗
        Muse and GrokBot are catching on so maybe not.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.