‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

DraftKings is using AI to behaviorally target chronic gamblers

570 points · 432 comments · paimapi

  1. tedivm · · focus · HN ↗
    ProPublica had one of their reports work with gambling addition experts to see how DraftKings would respond to someone presenting signs of a gambling problem. It's a hell of a read, and makes it clear that this company is full of people with absolutely no ethics whatsoever.

    <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.propublica.org&#x2F;article&#x2F;draftkings-sports-gambling-problem-vip-fanduel" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.propublica.org&#x2F;article&#x2F;draftkings-sports-gamblin...

    1. jimbo808 · · focus · HN ↗
      &gt; this company is full of people with absolutely no ethics whatsoever

      I believe this applies to any company which sells an inherently harmful, predatory, and addictive product or service

      1. SoftTalker · · focus · HN ↗
        Hope you&#x27;re including all the state governments and their lotteries in this assessment.
        1. tuvix · · focus · HN ↗
          The incentives driving state lotteries are not nearly as strong as those driving private companies like Draft Kings but yeah not great either.

          Used to work at 7-Eleven and we would have people come in and out for hours on end pouring money into scratch tickets.

          State lotteries are just a regressive tax targeting the poor.

          1. autoexec · · focus · HN ↗
            &gt; State lotteries are just a regressive tax targeting the poor.

            As bad as the odds are, the lottery is still the best chance most players will ever have to be millionaires

            1. fragmede · · focus · HN ↗
              To be a millionaire, maybe, but a $300&#x2F;month scrather habit over 20 years, in a 401k that&#x27;s just the SP 500 gets you a quarter million dollars, which isn&#x27;t nothing to retire on, vs approximately $0 from scratchers.
              1. gambiting · · focus · HN ↗
                Dude no offense but you must be vastly overestimating how many people can save $300 a month. We&#x27;re talking about people buying couple lottery tickets a month.
                1. rootusrootus · · focus · HN ↗
                  &gt; We&#x27;re talking about people buying couple lottery tickets a month

                  Those people do not have a gambling problem, though. They are dropping a few bucks a month to buy a daydream. It could be worse, they could be spending 10x that on Starbucks.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.