Thread

1. hizlikovboy27 · 1790573219 · focus · HN ↗

   the Augustine passage is a fascinating piece of evidence, but i wonder how much we can infer from it about the wider reading habits of the ancient world.

   1. rob74 · 1790575606 · focus · HN ↗

      To get to that, we have to first think about the literacy rate in antiquity, which is estimated at 5 to 10%. And of those, most could probably read well enough to get by, but didn't routinely read longer texts. So someone who was well-enough versed in reading to not have to read the text out loud in order to understand it was probably a rare and noteworthy creature indeed...

      1. js8 · 1790575923 · focus · HN ↗

         And you can't read long texts if there aren't that many to begin with. But it raises a question - why didn't China, which invented printing press earlier, didn't fare better?

         1. nephihaha · 1790587743 · focus · HN ↗

            Because the Chinese writing system is immensely complicated, and alphabets are far easier to typeset.

            You have to know over two thousand characters to read classical Chinese, with some appearing very rarely.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.