I think a more important question is whether Yemen still exists as as single coherent political entity with the same borders as seen on ANY of those maps, which given the present situation, it clearly does not.
edit: map here <a href="https://understandingwar.org/research/middle-east/iran-update-september-25-2026/" rel="nofollow">https://understandingwar.org/research/middle-east/iran-updat...
and here: <a href="https://yemen.liveuamap.com/" rel="nofollow">https://yemen.liveuamap.com/
"The protection to which civilian hospitals are entitled shall not cease unless they are used to commit, outside their humanitarian duties, acts harmful to the enemy." - Fourth Geneva Convention, Article 19(1)
There is literally no evidence at all the hospitals in Gaza are used for military purpose other than Israel's claims (and their botched attempt to fabricate evidence by placing guns in MRI machine of all place).
US and Israel also bombed hospital in Iran even though it's obviously clear that Iran doesn't fire ballistic missiles and drones from it.
Show me a picture of a single major Hamas military base that is not embedded in or under civilian infrastructure, just one, and I'll answer your question. Not a training camp, not an outpost, a major military base.
There isn't a picture of it because it doesn't exist? They have bunkers deep underground and that's it? Israel bombed civilian infrastructure because they want to kill civilians, the bunkers underground are just fine. Or else why would you think Hamas still exist today even though basically all of Gaza's building is obliterated?
Meanwhile Israel claim every hospital in Gaza is a Hamas base without any proof, not a single photo at all. Burden of proof is on the accuser, if you support Israel's claim, you should be the one providing evidence.
Note that Israelis already admitted they intentionally targeted civilians, <a href="https://www.lemkininstitute.com/single-post/israeli-soldiers-admit-killing-palestinians-in-gaza-no-matter-the-age-even-if-unarmed" rel="nofollow">https://www.lemkininstitute.com/single-post/israeli-soldiers...
> The first major case to break headlines in western media was the murder of two Christian women at Gaza City’s Holy Family Church on 16 December 2023. A Palestinian Catholic mother and her daughter were killed by an Israeli sniper while seeking refuge inside the church compound, resulting in condemnation from the pope.
> In January 2024, British broadcaster ITV captured the moment when 51-year-old Ramzi Abu Sahloul was shot through the chest, only moments after he had spoken on air. Sahloul was part of a group of civilians who were fleeing to Rafah in Gaza’s south while holding white flags on the orders of the Israeli military.
And that's not even mentioning their pogrom in the West Bank right now, <a href="https://www.haaretz.com/west-bank/2026-10-01/ty-article/.premium/israeli-settlers-shoot-and-kill-palestinian-wound-others-in-west-bank-village/000001a0-f767-de52-afe1-f7e7fcd00000" rel="nofollow">https://www.haaretz.com/west-bank/2026-10-01/ty-article/.pre...
> The village's municipal council head reportedly said that the settlers attacked residents' homes under the protection of Israeli forces. The IDF also reportedly blocked an ambulance in the village, seized its key and threw it away
"The strategic logic of human shields has two components. It is based on an awareness of Israel's desire to minimise collateral damage, and of Western public opinion's sensitivity towards civilian casualties. If the IDF uses lethal force and causes an increase in civilian casualties, Hamas can utilise that as a lawfare tool: it can accuse Israel of committing war crimes, which could result in the imposition of a wide array of sanctions.
Alternatively, if the IDF limits its use of military force in Gaza to avoid collateral damage, Hamas will be less susceptible to Israeli attacks, and thereby able to protect its assets while continuing to fight."
What you linked is literally a bunch of self-claims by Israel like I said. "Oh there is a bunch of civilians on the roof, let's just circle two of them and call them Hamas".
Provide real evidence that's not just "IDF said so". Though you probably can't, because if you can, you wouldn't give a random pdf from a NATO propaganda think tank instead of a real source.
Meanwhile Israel's use of using Palestinians as human shields are well-documented by Israeli organizations:
You are not arguing in good faith, instead you are arguing in an adversarial manner. You're not engaging with my points at all, instead you are relying on fallacious logic. I'm sorry that your upbringing has robbed you of a critical mind. Good luck.
walrus01 · · focus · HN ↗
edit: map here <a href="https://understandingwar.org/research/middle-east/iran-update-september-25-2026/" rel="nofollow">https://understandingwar.org/research/middle-east/iran-updat...
and here: <a href="https://yemen.liveuamap.com/" rel="nofollow">https://yemen.liveuamap.com/
throwaway27448 · · focus · HN ↗
[dead]
walrus01 · · focus · HN ↗
badnew · · focus · HN ↗
arczyx · · focus · HN ↗
badnew · · focus · HN ↗
arczyx · · focus · HN ↗
US and Israel also bombed hospital in Iran even though it's obviously clear that Iran doesn't fire ballistic missiles and drones from it.
badnew · · focus · HN ↗
arczyx · · focus · HN ↗
Meanwhile Israel claim every hospital in Gaza is a Hamas base without any proof, not a single photo at all. Burden of proof is on the accuser, if you support Israel's claim, you should be the one providing evidence.
Note that Israelis already admitted they intentionally targeted civilians, <a href="https://www.lemkininstitute.com/single-post/israeli-soldiers-admit-killing-palestinians-in-gaza-no-matter-the-age-even-if-unarmed" rel="nofollow">https://www.lemkininstitute.com/single-post/israeli-soldiers...
> The first major case to break headlines in western media was the murder of two Christian women at Gaza City’s Holy Family Church on 16 December 2023. A Palestinian Catholic mother and her daughter were killed by an Israeli sniper while seeking refuge inside the church compound, resulting in condemnation from the pope.
> In January 2024, British broadcaster ITV captured the moment when 51-year-old Ramzi Abu Sahloul was shot through the chest, only moments after he had spoken on air. Sahloul was part of a group of civilians who were fleeing to Rafah in Gaza’s south while holding white flags on the orders of the Israeli military.
And that's not even mentioning their pogrom in the West Bank right now, <a href="https://www.haaretz.com/west-bank/2026-10-01/ty-article/.premium/israeli-settlers-shoot-and-kill-palestinian-wound-others-in-west-bank-village/000001a0-f767-de52-afe1-f7e7fcd00000" rel="nofollow">https://www.haaretz.com/west-bank/2026-10-01/ty-article/.pre...
> The village's municipal council head reportedly said that the settlers attacked residents' homes under the protection of Israeli forces. The IDF also reportedly blocked an ambulance in the village, seized its key and threw it away
badnew · · focus · HN ↗
> Or else why would you think Hamas still exist today even though basically all of Gaza's building is obliterated?
Ok, now put two and two together. You're close. I'll give you a hint:
<a href="https://stratcomcoe.org/pdfjs/?file=/publications/download/hamas_human_shields.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://stratcomcoe.org/pdfjs/?file=/publications/download/h...
"The strategic logic of human shields has two components. It is based on an awareness of Israel's desire to minimise collateral damage, and of Western public opinion's sensitivity towards civilian casualties. If the IDF uses lethal force and causes an increase in civilian casualties, Hamas can utilise that as a lawfare tool: it can accuse Israel of committing war crimes, which could result in the imposition of a wide array of sanctions.
Alternatively, if the IDF limits its use of military force in Gaza to avoid collateral damage, Hamas will be less susceptible to Israeli attacks, and thereby able to protect its assets while continuing to fight."
arczyx · · focus · HN ↗
Provide real evidence that's not just "IDF said so". Though you probably can't, because if you can, you wouldn't give a random pdf from a NATO propaganda think tank instead of a real source.
Meanwhile Israel's use of using Palestinians as human shields are well-documented by Israeli organizations:
<a href="https://www.btselem.org/topic/human_shields" rel="nofollow">https://www.btselem.org/topic/human_shields
<a href="https://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/2025-05-24/ty-article/israeli-use-of-human-shields-in-gaza-was-systemic-soldiers-and-former-detainees-tell-ap/00000197-01e6-dc94-ab97-0fee1dd40000" rel="nofollow">https://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/2025-05-24/ty-artic...
<a href="https://www.breakingthesilence.org.il/testimonies/database/?ci=143" rel="nofollow">https://www.breakingthesilence.org.il/testimonies/database/?...
badnew · · focus · HN ↗