Supreme Court permits states to use SAVE database for citizenship checks
Thread
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
Supreme Court permits states to use SAVE database for citizenship checks
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
ck2 · · focus · HN ↗
remember Heritage Foundation spent a small fortune to try to find illegal voting over the past decades and they only found a handful of cases, most accidental and not willful and far too few to cause any effect at all
if the Dems get the Senate somehow and don't immediately pass laws to protect voting against actions of the Executive, well then they deserve to lose 2028
of course he'll veto everything but there might be enough will to override
sejje · · focus · HN ↗
They found hundreds of cases this year in Pennsylvania, from the 2020 election alone, with a lot more left to look at.
hydrogen7800 · · focus · HN ↗
This something like an order of magnitude lower than the error margin.
sejje · · focus · HN ↗
Al Franken won a senate seat by 312 votes in 2008
A Maine House seat was won by 1 vote in 2024
1 illegal vote is too many.
goatlover · · focus · HN ↗
sejje · · focus · HN ↗
Every political party and their allies say their opponents can't be allowed to win, at least the last few election cycles. It's a tired trope that "Trump is going to do xyz thing to stay in power." It's a hysteria cycle, and none of it ever comes true.
wredcoll · · focus · HN ↗
sejje · · focus · HN ↗
That's my best guess at what you're refuting, since I had it in quotes. Otherwise you're just vagueposting on a 4-day old thread. Try being more specific, make a point.