‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Google’s Project Suncatcher to put ML infrastructure in space

233 points · 553 comments · xnx

  1. kin · · focus · HN ↗
    For those questioning viability, there&#x27;s a startup called Starcloud <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.starcloud.com&#x2F;">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.starcloud.com&#x2F; with a public whitepaper explaining a bit their hardware and economics <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.starcloud.com&#x2F;wp">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.starcloud.com&#x2F;wp. They&#x27;ve already had one small proof of concept launched. Not trying to promote, I just heard about them on the ycomb podcast
    1. stingrae · · focus · HN ↗
      “A 5 GW data center would require a solar array with dimensions of approximately 4 km by 4 km”

      I think dodging debris is challenging at that scale.

      Also this is the solar cells not the radiators

      1. flog · · focus · HN ↗
        I wonder if the shadows from such a large area would have a climate cooling effect?
        1. me_again · · focus · HN ↗
          The Earth&#x27;s surface area is ~ 510,000,000 km^2. For simplicity, say exactly half of it is receiving sunlight. If the satellite perfectly shadows 16 km^2, it would reduce incoming solar energy reaching Earth by 16&#x2F;205,000,000 = 0.00000078%, I think.

          So not really. There are some proposals for space-based geoengineering, <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sciencedirect.com&#x2F;science&#x2F;article&#x2F;pii&#x2F;S1462901125002291" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sciencedirect.com&#x2F;science&#x2F;article&#x2F;pii&#x2F;S146290112... has a summary. I can&#x27;t say how plausible any of them are.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.