‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Toyota is taking the Corolla electric

446 points · 838 comments · cisc

  1. freetime2 · · focus · HN ↗
    Cars that are designed from the ground up to be EVs tend to be much better than trying to shoehorn an EV into an ICE design.

    The new Lexus ES350e, which comes in both hybrid and EV flavors, has been pretty universally panned as a mediocre EV [1]. Lexus anticipates that the vast majority of ES sales will be for the hybrid model, and I expect the same will be true of the Corolla.

    The updated bZ and new bZ Woodland on the other hand, which are built as ground-up EVs on the e-TNGA platform, actually seem pretty decent. And I'm hopeful for the upcoming EV Highlander, too (although that will use a modified version of the TNGA-K platform).

    I would prefer if Toyota just released a new EV model with roughly the same proportions as the Corolla, instead of going with the one-size-fits-all approach. But maybe they'll finally be able to get it right this time.

    [1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=QQ97R1nhq4M" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=QQ97R1nhq4M

    1. hn_submit · · focus · HN ↗
      I agree that it&#x27;s much better to design an EV to be an EV from the ground up. The reality is, however, that consumers don&#x27;t want EVs for a myriad of reasons and prefer hybrids. And developing two completely different platforms is too expensive even for a higly profitable company like Toyota.
      1. xbmcuser · · focus · HN ↗
        Consumers don&#x27;t want an expensive EV. Now that EVs are becoming cheaper than ICE vehicles, they will take over the market because they are the better product.
        1. java-man · · focus · HN ↗
          This is exactly right. 2026 Nissan LEAF is at 30k point, once it drops down to 20-25 it&#x27;s over for internal combustion cars.
          1. wolvoleo · · focus · HN ↗
            No it&#x27;s not. If you live in a flat where are you going to charge the thing? Around here there&#x27;s almost no charging points and the ones that are there are constantly occupied.

            I gladly don&#x27;t own a car but if I did it would be an ICE for sure.

            1. imtringued · · focus · HN ↗
              Charging infrastructure for flats is expensive at $4k per parking lot, but the charging infrastructure lasts longer than the car, meaning that the primary problem has nothing to do with money and more to do with the fact that it&#x27;s an all or nothing proposition where everyone has to get on board simultaneously.
              1. wolvoleo · · focus · HN ↗
                That doesn&#x27;t count the distribution network for actually getting that energy there. This is the main problem right now. Right now in Holland even people wanting to build a house are blocked because the energy networks are full.

                And it&#x27;s not the only country with that issue.

                And charging infra doesn&#x27;t last longer than the car, standards are still changing a lot, and getting faster charge modes that put more burden on distribution nets.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.