Thread

Samsung accidentally freezes its smart fridges with a software update

247 points · 284 comments · Markoff

diskzero · 1790171248 · focus · HN ↗
We ended up with a Samsung fridge in our new home. It has no external display or any other indication that it is a "smart" fridge. I only found out when a friend visited who has a Samsung phone and the phone offered to connect to the fridge. We spent the next 30 minutes removing panels from the fridge and found the wifi/bluetooth antenna on a small board under the top-right hinge cover. The board was disconnected and the fridge continues to operate normally.
I am now eyeing my dishwasher very suspiciously.
1. jasode · 1790173122 · focus · HN ↗
  >I am now eyeing my dishwasher very suspiciously.
  Appliances with mandatory wi-fi is a bad trend. The mid-tier dishwasher from Bosch locks the Eco(nomy) energy saver cycle, delayed start, etc functionality behind a smartphone app. This requires connecting the dishwasher to wi-fi and using the smartphone to create a Bosch online account. That's what the whole Jeff Geerling complaint video was all about.
  <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5M_hmwBBPnc&t=4m21s" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5M_hmwBBPnc&t=4m21s
  1. nicoburns · 1790173267 · focus · HN ↗
    Aside: I heard that "eco mode" is typically not actually the most energy efficient mode on most washing machines. Apparently it's a standard mode they have to add so that energy efficiency can be measured across machines, but that means it can't be optimised.
    You're typically better off looking for some kind quick/fast mode. Or even the "regular" mode.
    (YMMV, look things up for your specific model)
    piltdownman · 1790173643 · focus · HN ↗
    That's not true in the EU anyway.
    Under EU Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/2023, washing machines sold in the European Union must include a mandatory standardized program called "Eco 40-60".
    The whole point is to enforce strict legal limits on maximum water and electricity consumption per cycle based on the machine's rated capacity. This it the reason they tend to run for hours - it uses less water and energy than a standard cotton cycle by having longer soak times and using less electricity to heat the water.
    In 1995 it took 94 litres of water and 350 kWh/a for a cycle in the average EU washing machine. These measures, amongst others, reduced that to 36 l/cycle and 96 kWh/a in 2020 and an expected 30 l/cycle by 2030.
    <a href="https://energy-efficient-products.ec.europa.eu/product-list/washer-dryers_en" rel="nofollow">https://energy-efficient-products.ec.europa.eu/product-list/...
    <a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32019R2023" rel="nofollow">https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELE...
    dingaling · 1790177741 · focus · HN ↗
    The irony being that Eco loads are necessarily smaller, for soaking and to draw less current through the motor, so to do the same amount of clothes as one 'planet killer' wash you need to do at least two 'Eco' cycles.
    TLDR: there aren't really any shortcuts to getting dirt out of clothes.
    catlikesshrimp · 1790180333 · focus · HN ↗
    Using durable clothes for as long as they... endure. Definitely not flash fashion.
    Since I live in a poor country, I am allowed to use cotton shirts until too much skin shows (hyperbole, I only allow one small hole) Then, it becomes a rag or a mop 100% of the time.
    Having few stains in an worn bought-new shirt is a good indicator of not being rich and still having class.
    Eco friendly means unfashionable most of the time. Smaller cars, or even public transport, god forbid.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.