Thread

1. legitster · 1790105097 · focus · HN ↗

   > It found the U.S. “failed in its obligation to do everything feasible to verify” that the school was a military objective and that the failure “went beyond mere negligence.” The report said the United States “directed the strikes at the building of the school while being aware of a substantial risk of striking a civilian object and acting recklessly as regards the possibility that this would happen.”

   Reading the details, "AI" doesn't really seem like the culprit -it's a scapegoat.

   The intelligence that it was no longer a military target never entered the target database, the team that was responsible for vetting the target list was gutted, and said team was never even consulted.

   The White House wanted 1000 targets and pulled from their database without any due diligence. Whether it was an AI call or an SQL query - this was from pure human maliciousness and incompetence.

   1. someonebaggy · 1790171324 · focus · HN ↗

      I think AI wrote this comment.

      1. mahboi · 1790207943 · focus · HN ↗

         I don't think so, but it kinda looks like it but with - instead of –, also it'd be funnier if it were AI defending AI.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.