I thought the Macbook Pro LCDs were bright enough, high-res-enough, and fast enough to make a very accurate CRT simulation. Here it is: <a href="https://github.com/baragona/crt-xdr" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/baragona/crt-xdr
It looks so much like a CRT to me. It looks like pressing your face up to a TV to see the individual phosphors. Try setting "signal" to dropped image and viewing some images. It looks like an old TV.
Bottom line, whatever you think a CRT is doing, you can probably simulate it quite accurately.
perhaps was 60hz interlaced. I had memories of my first CRT monitor only allowing to do 1024x768 in interlaced and doing a very obvious flickering. But was flicker free at 800x600 and lower resolutions.
etaioinshrdlu · · focus · HN ↗
It looks so much like a CRT to me. It looks like pressing your face up to a TV to see the individual phosphors. Try setting "signal" to dropped image and viewing some images. It looks like an old TV.
Bottom line, whatever you think a CRT is doing, you can probably simulate it quite accurately.
layer8 · · focus · HN ↗
Measter · · focus · HN ↗
sublinear · · focus · HN ↗
Maybe you mean screen tearing, bad deinterlacing, etc. caused by software running on a PC?
Measter · · focus · HN ↗
sublinear · · focus · HN ↗
I get that CRTs aren't perfect, but I'm not sure how else to reproduce what you're calling "flicker".
Zardoz84 · · focus · HN ↗