‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Android 17 is the first since 3.x to add new APIs without releasing to the AOSP

1180 points · 723 comments · theanonymousone

  1. wps · · focus · HN ↗
    The amount of roadblocks Google is putting up for GrapheneOS is just ridiculous. None of their decisions make any sense, from the delayed source patches upstream, to the embargos, attestation issues, etc. Google simply regrets android being open source.
    1. godelski · · focus · HN ↗
      I hope people remember this when advocating for chromium. Just because it is open source doesn't mean they don't control it. We need to start the long process of hard forking now or turn to alternatives like Firefox as a new foundation.

        > Google simply regrets android being open source.
      
      Android wouldn't be what it is if it wasn't open source. With all the work from outside Google. The same is true chrome.

      But they won't learn that on their own. They are breaking the deals. So we move. We force their hand

      1. nomel · · focus · HN ↗
        > So we move. We force their hand

        What do you have in mind?

        1. JumpCrisscross · · focus · HN ↗
          Donate to Ladybird <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ladybird.org&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ladybird.org&#x2F;
          1. soraminazuki · · focus · HN ↗

            [dead]

            1. hobo123 · · focus · HN ↗
              Where in those comments is the &quot;white replacement theorist&quot;?
              1. soraminazuki · · focus · HN ↗
                &gt; White males are actively discriminated against

                The words are unambiguous and not up for debate.

                1. isityettime · · focus · HN ↗
                  It seems to me like the more intellectually honest characterization of things like hiring quotas and admissions quotas is &quot;discrimination in the interest of the good&quot; or &quot;compensatory discrimination&quot; rather than &quot;this isn&#x27;t discrimination&quot;. It&#x27;s not a little-known practice and it doesn&#x27;t negatively affect only white men (it also negatively affects East Asian men, for instance).

                  If you think those hiring practices are justified against a backdrop of ongoing white supremacy, patriarchy, etc., say that. If you think they&#x27;re only a small adjustment in the big picture in a world where tacit norms of credibility, transgenerational wealth, and interpersonal connections still overwhelmingly favor white men, say that. But when someone says &quot;hiring practices actively try to tell people apart by race and ethnicity in a way that disfavors my odds&quot; and you reply amounts &quot;nuh-uh, and you can&#x27;t say that!&quot;, you frankly weaken the left. Stop it.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.