‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

I don't like passkeys

853 points · 819 comments · ethanhawksley

  1. drtz · · focus · HN ↗
    Passkeys do marginally improve security against MITM and phishing attacks, but they are primarily for protecting the lowest common denominator from themselves: people who re-use passwords and/or don't use a password manager.

    If you use multiple devices throughout the day, registering passkeys in all of these systems becomes a big headache with O(m*n) complexity, so putting the passkeys in a password manager is the only realistic solution. But this still breaks the login flow for a very common use case: how do I log in on a device that I don't own? With a password in a password manager I at least have the option of manually typing the password.

    The biggest problem, though, is how users are pushed into it without any warning or knowledge of what they're signing up for. I've accidentally set up passkeys just by clicking an okay button a few times in the past and had to go back and figure out how to undo it after being blocked from login on another computer (which computer was I on again?).

    1. judge2020 · · focus · HN ↗
      > how do I log in on a device that I don't own?

      This is solved by passkey-implementing software and devices (with Bluetooth) allowing you to log in with a QR code (Webauthn via CTAP hybrid transport). iOS and Android support this, and it’s generally not a locked-down thing if other devices wanted to do it too.

      The only use case left is in “how do I login if all my devices are stolen/fall into a body of water” in which there really isn’t an answer beyond “get (a|your) device back, sign back into your password manager, use that to get back into critical accounts”.

      1. 201984 · · focus · HN ↗
        What if the computer you want to log in on doesn't have Bluetooth? Probably most public computers (like ones in libraries) don't have it.
        1. judge2020 · · focus · HN ↗
          Only if they’re a bit old. Nowadays WiFi chips double as Bluetooth chips on newer platforms.
          1. cesarb · · focus · HN ↗
            > > What if the computer you want to log in on doesn't have Bluetooth?

            > Only if they’re a bit old. Nowadays WiFi chips double as Bluetooth chips on newer platforms.

            What if the computer you want to log in on doesn't have a WiFi chip?

            It doesn't have to be an old computer; for instance, the desktop computer I built last year uses a wired gigabit Ethernet connection to the router right next to it, and doesn't have (or need) any WiFi or Bluetooth chip.

            1. RHSeeger · · focus · HN ↗
              The computer I just replaced had neither wifi nor bluetooth. It was a desktop device and had no use for either.
          2. reaperducer · · focus · HN ↗
            Only if they’re a bit old. Nowadays WiFi chips double as Bluetooth chips on newer platforms.

            That's a technocratic reply, not one that is useful in the real world.

            As noted by the person you're replying to, it's not his computer. It's a public library.

            Most computers in non-residential settings will have various features locked down, including Bluetooth.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.