‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

WangNet – 1.8 MB, zero-dependency Numberwang adjudication in 11 languages

182 points · 63 comments · Liogra123

  1. tazjin · · focus · HN ↗
    I don't think that this produces correct results, as it seems to determine whether each individual number is Numberwang. However, whether a number is Numberwang can also depend on the previous numbers in the sequence or other factors.

    So I think as it stands right now this model can only determine whether a number would be Numberwang as the first number of a sequence, but even for that I still wouldn't rely on this in the actual game show.

    1. aesthesia · · focus · HN ↗
      I'm also not sure that we know a non-number can never be Numberwang.
      1. ceocoder · · focus · HN ↗
        A non-number could be either a Numberwang OR a Wanganumb - this does depend on whether Yorkshire is a pudding or not.
        1. jmcqk6 · · focus · HN ↗
          It's not well known, but in February of 1983, there was a finch in the Galapagos that was found to be numberwang. And of course there was the famous incident in the 1994 World Series where a homerun was overturned because it turned out it was a wangernumb hit into the stands, and not a standard baseball.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.