Thread

1. tazjin · 1789503947 · focus · HN ↗

   I don't think that this produces correct results, as it seems to determine whether each individual number is Numberwang. However, whether a number is Numberwang can also depend on the previous numbers in the sequence or other factors.

   So I think as it stands right now this model can only determine whether a number would be Numberwang as the first number of a sequence, but even for that I still wouldn't rely on this in the actual game show.

   1. aesthesia · 1789504789 · focus · HN ↗

      I'm also not sure that we know a non-number can never be Numberwang.

      1. ceocoder · 1789505118 · focus · HN ↗

         A non-number could be either a Numberwang OR a Wanganumb - this does depend on whether Yorkshire is a pudding or not.

         1. jmcqk6 · 1789509729 · focus · HN ↗

            It's not well known, but in February of 1983, there was a finch in the Galapagos that was found to be numberwang. And of course there was the famous incident in the 1994 World Series where a homerun was overturned because it turned out it was a wangernumb hit into the stands, and not a standard baseball.
      2. aidenn0 · 1789518734 · focus · HN ↗

         If you think about The Event you can figure it out. (Don't think about The Event).

         1. blipvert · 1789543894 · focus · HN ↗

            It is unlikely to be necessary on HN to remind readers to remain indoors.
      3. TechSquidTV · 1789530514 · focus · HN ↗

         Woah believe it or not, that's Numberwang!
      4. mechazawa · 1789548627 · focus · HN ↗

         blueth is numberwang tho

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.