‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Introducing System One Models and Jev

1989 points · 520 comments · albelfio

  1. albelfio · · focus · HN ↗
    <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;completeskeptic&#x2F;status&#x2F;2099925682726002904?s=46" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;completeskeptic&#x2F;status&#x2F;2099925682726002904?s=4...

    The doom demo is quite cool

    1. ErneX · · focus · HN ↗
      Direct link to the Doom video tweet:

      <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;completeskeptic&#x2F;status&#x2F;2099925687465570372" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;completeskeptic&#x2F;status&#x2F;2099925687465570372

      1. thih9 · · focus · HN ↗
        The doom video is also in the article itself (headline: &quot;Doom&quot;).

        I suppose this is the same video as the one from the parent comment, but I don&#x27;t know for sure - I don&#x27;t have a twitter account and the above link doesn&#x27;t work for me.

        1. yehat · · focus · HN ↗
          oh, the offended pricks pop like cockroaches when somebody links to X... and yes, there&#x27;re no twitter accounts because there&#x27;s no twitter... duh
        2. ErneX · · focus · HN ↗
          I linked to the tweet that has the video because if you are not signed in you cannot see the whole thread of tweets.

          I can see the individual tweets in the browser while not signed in though.

    2. magicmicah85 · · focus · HN ↗
      The doom demo is also in the article, for anyone that doesn&#x27;t want to go to X.com. :)
    3. lelandbatey · · focus · HN ↗
      Link to a raw MP4 of the video, from the parent article: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;framerusercontent.com&#x2F;assets&#x2F;rlL7ImEbISFoYt3IJEHHfvjpY.mp4" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;framerusercontent.com&#x2F;assets&#x2F;rlL7ImEbISFoYt3IJEHHfvj...

      It&#x27;s in the parent article under a section named &quot;Doom&quot; in case that asset URL ever changes.

    4. einpoklum · · focus · HN ↗
      But when their system is given the instruction &quot;do not fire, simply dodge&quot; - it doesn&#x27;t &quot;simply dodge&quot;, it actually gets close to the fleshy pink demon rather than keeping its distance. Or am I misunderstanding?
      1. anthonypasq · · focus · HN ↗
        i think its just telling the model that it cant output a shoot action
    5. caspar · · focus · HN ↗
      I&#x27;m not sure the authors realize this is way more than &quot;just a cool demo&quot;: if this holds up, it&#x27;s going to be huge for game QA work.

      Instrument your game to output properties of entities near the player and the output is the various control inputs - moment to moment gameplay gets solved. Maybe augment with a tick-by-tick controlled stepping mode if particularly twitchy - an LLM can take care of the higher level reasoning then.

      1. Garlef · · focus · HN ↗
        yes; and it could also be used to spot unexpected behavior such as inputs not registering due to rare bugs
    6. smusamashah · · focus · HN ↗
      Doesn&#x27;t this mean Jev can be used to drive a car as well?
    7. baist0 · · focus · HN ↗
      lol! they reinvented aim bot for cheaters.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.