Improper redaction reveals Google Data Center water and electricity usage
Thread
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
Improper redaction reveals Google Data Center water and electricity usage
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
motionlessveloc · · focus · HN ↗
The one exception is if they're using fossil water pumped from aquifers, which doesn't renew (back into the aquifer that is), but nobody seems to bother to make the distinction.
eesmith · · focus · HN ↗
If you pump water out of one watershed into another, perhaps via evaporation and wind transport, then you better expect the downstream users, deprived of their water, to complain.
For example, the upstream users of water from the Colorado use so much that Colorado River Delta is nearly always dry. Or read about the California water wars.
Further, increased competition for surface water raises prices, which encourages additional aquifer extraction.
nradov · · focus · HN ↗
eesmith · · focus · HN ↗
Yes, water rights law is complicated. California's access to water from the Colorado River is due to the Colorado River Compact, which exists because state disagreed on the details of how water "goes back out into the environment".
That said, I was under the impression that many data centers use municipal water, which is more subject to market price, and not water allocated by property rights. While certainly some do, it isn't always so.