Thread

Improper redaction reveals Google Data Center water and electricity usage

384 points · 503 comments · sensanaty

eleventen · 1791146118 · focus · HN ↗
There is sometimes incorrect conflation between what the datacenter is permitted for and what the datacenter actually draws.
> Many articles about current or future AI data centers report the number in the water permit they apply for as the amount of water they actually use day to day. But this almost never happens. [1]
This is from the problematic and often wrong but in this case correct Andy Masley. It's not completely clear to me whether this number is observed usage or a theoretical permitted maximum, in which case the actual usage could be even lower. It could be either.
[1] <a href="https://blog.andymasley.com/p/the-ai-water-issue-is-fake?open=false#%C2%A7every-popular-article-about-how-ais-water-use-is-bad-for-the-environment-in-the-last-year-has-had-a-wildly-misleading-framing" rel="nofollow">https://blog.andymasley.com/p/the-ai-water-issue-is-fake?ope...
1. XCabbage · 1791147536 · focus · HN ↗
  Why is Masley "problematic" and what's he been wrong about?
  1. scarmig · 1791151415 · focus · HN ↗
    He's done just terrible things, the accusations are true. No one wants to associate with him because of all the bad things he's done. Everyone knows he's a liar, and anyone asking for evidence of it is a perfidious pro-AI ideologue.
    simianwords · 1791179136 · focus · HN ↗
    What terrible things has he done and what accusations? I'm going assume I won't get any reply to my comment
    zahlman · 1791185645 · focus · HN ↗
    I'm pretty sure that comment was intended as sarcastic.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.