Improper redaction reveals Google Data Center water and electricity usage
Thread
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
Improper redaction reveals Google Data Center water and electricity usage
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
fasterik · · focus · HN ↗
therein · · focus · HN ↗
[dead]
fasterik · · focus · HN ↗
I find it more and more common that people who disagree online respond by attacking the commenter personally instead of addressing their arguments. Saying "it's bigger" isn't enough; you need to explain why a building full of computers is fine if it's 100 acres but not if it's 1000 acres. You also need to explain why we shouldn't oppose comparable scale manufacturing, research, or warehousing facilities.
Cameras are different than data centers. Trying to connect the two is a rhetorical technique, not an argument.
therein · · focus · HN ↗
Because one of them has a ton of GPUs and TPUs in it while the other one doesn't.
And for the cameras, one is doing using state of the art detection and has connectivity.
Both are obvious things to people in here.
goda90 · · focus · HN ↗
tzs · · focus · HN ↗
fasterik · · focus · HN ↗
hinkley · · focus · HN ↗
ButlerianJihad · · focus · HN ↗
Tonto, dunno who "we" is but around my metro area, public drinking is rather tightly controlled.
I am not really aware of the laws around walking down a public sidewalk with a beer in hand. It is certainly gauche but a done-thing to sit at a bus stop and have a Fireball or two.
However, any drinking establishment that serves alcohol will stop you at the door and won't permit anyone to carry drinks outside of their premises. That's a strict thing. My apartment community bans drinking in walkways and stairwells, which was probably done more by non-residents than my neighbors. So there are a lot of bans on public drinking, even if it is not blanket-outlawed.
A couple of major developments at the shopping mall, though: traditionally all American movie theaters were dry, but that rule has been relaxed, and even the major chains are serving alcohol now. At the mall there has been instituted a "sip & stroll" policy, where designated bars can serve you a plastic cup, and you can roam around the mall with drink-in-hand, as long as you observe the borders of it, where you can't walk into the parking lot or off-premises with your booze.
In general, I have seen many liquor-related laws be relaxed and lightened across my county and state. It seems that there's a general lack of will to crack down on the demand-side, when there is lots and lots of profit to be had on the healthcare-side, where you will get a diagnosis and medication and treatment, whether that is IOP or in-patient, so why not encourage more drinkers to overindulge? Broken window fallacy FTW!
ryukoposting · · focus · HN ↗
Relevant reading: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-container_law" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-container_law
tl;dr details vary by state and municipality, but with very few exceptions you can't walk around a random town drinking fireball. Or, well, you can as long as you don't get caught.
I've seen what you're talking about though. It seems like the big trend for millenials has been "<blank> but with booze." Barcades. Sip & stroll at malls. Booze in movie theaters. Paint & Sip. The microbrewery craze that's partly just "bars but make them fancy"
If you really want to get thrown for a loop, go read up about the Tavern League. One of the most powerful lobbies in Wisconsin state government is a massive cartel of... bars.
TheJoeMan · · focus · HN ↗
bryan_w · · focus · HN ↗