Thread

1. eleventen · 1791146118 · focus · HN ↗

   There is sometimes incorrect conflation between what the datacenter is permitted for and what the datacenter actually draws.

   > Many articles about current or future AI data centers report the number in the water permit they apply for as the amount of water they actually use day to day. But this almost never happens. [1]

   This is from the problematic and often wrong but in this case correct Andy Masley. It's not completely clear to me whether this number is observed usage or a theoretical permitted maximum, in which case the actual usage could be even lower. It could be either.

   [1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.andymasley.com&#x2F;p&#x2F;the-ai-water-issue-is-fake?open=false#%C2%A7every-popular-article-about-how-ais-water-use-is-bad-for-the-environment-in-the-last-year-has-had-a-wildly-misleading-framing" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.andymasley.com&#x2F;p&#x2F;the-ai-water-issue-is-fake?ope...

   1. XCabbage · 1791147536 · focus · HN ↗

      Why is Masley &quot;problematic&quot; and what&#x27;s he been wrong about?

      1. bluecheese452 · 1791148640 · focus · HN ↗

         He won’t toe the official line. You will always get a vague claim of being “problematic” if you don’t challenge the status quo.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.