‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

RuneScape's Position on Gen AI

28 points · 66 comments · cautiouscat

  1. royal__ · · focus · HN ↗
    There's a lot of anti-AI warriors on Reddit in the game development space. I dislike lazy AI slop use in games as much as anyone else, but I also dislike the lack of nuance in these positions. They think it's gotta be all or nothing. It will become increasingly unrealistic to expect game developers to not use AI in some part of their process, especially code development, but such use does not automatically make it slop.
    1. rolosa · · focus · HN ↗
      The context is that the company posted a trailer video that was very obviously AI generated art (6 fingers, Nike shoes in a fantasy setting). The pushback is entirely focused on using the slop machine to make slop art and writing.
      1. StevenWaterman · · focus · HN ↗
        It is, but the statement goes further than that and says they use no gen ai at all in making their games. Which feels unnecessary, unless they mean just in the art and writing, which feels misleading
        1. cubefox · · focus · HN ↗
          In particular, it would mean their software engineers are not allowed to use Claude/Codex etc, in contrast to common industry practice.
          1. galleywest200 · · focus · HN ↗
            Which is fine. RuneScape has been in development since the early 2000s, long before GenAI even existed. They got along before GenAI and they can continue to not use it.

            People may be forgetting the game has 20 years of content already, why do they need to make more faster with GenAI? Its already a massive piece of software.

            Runescape is quite literally a dinner table name it is that famous. Their only true competition is probably World of Warcraft. The community is already huge. What competitive advantages are they going to lose? Likely none.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.