‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

RuneScape's Position on Gen AI

28 points · 66 comments · cautiouscat

  1. CivBase · · focus · HN ↗
    Seems like a perfectly good response to me.
    1. cautiouscat · · focus · HN ↗
      I agree. It does make me think these tools need an irrevocable signature on the files, if that’s even possible. You can ask someone you’re commissioning if they use AI, and they can just lie.

      Now should have Jagex reviewed it? Of course. However, there’s just this mistrust in art now. I’ve commissioned two things from artists. I asked both, as for my work I want to fund actual artists. However as these tools get better, I’m concerned that trust won’t be good enough.

      Fake edit: “Well if it’s so good you can’t tell the difference then why’s it matter” completely misses the point so let’s not bother with that.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.