Run Qwen 3.8 Flash Next (125B) on consumer hardware (RTX 4090) at 100T/s
Thread
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
Run Qwen 3.8 Flash Next (125B) on consumer hardware (RTX 4090) at 100T/s
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
a11r · · focus · HN ↗
Winfred-zz · · focus · HN ↗
│------------------- │ Ninfer-3090 │ Strata
│ Code generation │ 52/78 (66.7%) │ 70/78 (89.7%)
│ Code completion │ 40/50 (80.0%) │ 44/50 (88.0%)
│ Total------------- │ 92/128 (71.9%) │ 114/128 (89.1%)
│ API failures------ │ 10 │ 5
- Ninfer generation: ~122 min total.
- Strata generation: ~142 min total.
So strata is a little slower, but keep in mind that ninfer-3090 is very optimized for a Qwen 3.8. Standard Qwen 3.8 runs at 20 t/s, this modified version can do 50 t/s (but it's extremely long in it's thinking, it just goes on and on.
This is on a 3090 that will crash unless power capped, with a Zen 2 CPU, 64GB DDR4 with a PCIe that refuses to go higher than 8x (basically pretty crappy all in all).
Yet with some tweaking and optimizing I still manage to get strata to run at 40 to 60 t/s.
That strata has been optimized on my Oh My Pi conversations. So when I'm using it, it's probably faster and closer to ninfer in speed than during those unoptimized benchmark tests.
greenavocado · · focus · HN ↗
seviu · · focus · HN ↗
I now backordered two more sparks, before the hike... hoping they will honor the agreed price and dont cancel on me. They should arrive in a month,
Its evidently clear the frontier labs won't keep on giving us cheap inference for much longer. I also watch in disbelief how people say a sub is cheaper, which probably is. But you loose on so many other things (privacy, predictability, censorship...)