‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

OpenBSD Developers Reject Uutils Coreutils

31 points · 42 comments · pjmlp

  1. ninjin · · focus · HN ↗
    What is this rubbish? We have "media" coverage trying to stir up drama about what happens on mailing lists now?

    Go and read the thread yourself [1] and you will see that the reason it was rejected was that no one saw a reason to take on the maintenance burden when you already need to have Gnu Core Utilities in ports to be able to build a heap of other ports. Focusing on theo@ calling out the submitter for having their judgement clouded by "Because Rust" misses the point.

    [1]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.mail-archive.com&#x2F;ports@openbsd.org&#x2F;msg143875.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.mail-archive.com&#x2F;ports@openbsd.org&#x2F;msg143875.htm...

    Besides, Rust already has a solid presence in ports and I know several experienced OpenBSD developers dabbling in it. But the language will never make it into base in its current form as OpenBSD expects self hosting and I think everything in base is Posix(-like), apart from Perl, but I have not taken the time to go digging through my &#x2F;usr&#x2F;src.

    1. pseudohadamard · · focus · HN ↗
      There&#x27;s also a pile of odd things about the article:

      &gt; OpenBSD 7.6 shipped in October 2024; 7.7 is expected in April 2025.

      &gt; As of 2024, it passes the majority of GNU coreutils test suites

      This is for an article dated September 2026. It&#x27;s not obviously AI-written but the dates are completely out of sync, it&#x27;s like a lot of it was written in 2024 and then other bits were added a week ago. A quick Google of the author&#x27;s name also doesn&#x27;t turn up anything that could be her, so possibly it is just AI slop.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.