> It appeared to Rabbi Navon that Mr. Olah and his team believed that Claude had what philosophers call “moral status” on par with a person — that it was a being with similar inherent rights to dignity or respect.
If that is true, then surely Anthropic is one of the largest slaveholders of history, right?
No, because in a social context, for people who understand implied intent and implied beliefs instead of just on-its-face logical propositions, it is an admission that the antecedent has a reasonable chance of being true. In social communication, if you don't believe something is possible, you simply dismiss any conditional statements following from it. Dispassionately arguing in a logical and objective manner is only possible for a tiny sliver of the population. The rest will get very angry and uncomfortable around such talk.
It wasn’t the pope, but it is
mentioned by I think a rabbi in the article. He relates telling Olah if he thinks models are conscious he should be fighting the South, freeing the slaves.
nextaccountic · · focus · HN ↗
If that is true, then surely Anthropic is one of the largest slaveholders of history, right?
adastra22 · · focus · HN ↗
bonoboTP · · focus · HN ↗
cluckindan · · focus · HN ↗
wowoc · · focus · HN ↗
bonoboTP · · focus · HN ↗
bondarchuk · · focus · HN ↗
bonoboTP · · focus · HN ↗
svnt · · focus · HN ↗