We're going to need default hard budget caps on pretty much everything
Thread
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
We're going to need default hard budget caps on pretty much everything
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
joshdavham · · focus · HN ↗
Also, does anyone know why it’s taken this long? I suspect it’s a technical reason. While one could be cynical, I doubt it’s an intentional business/product decision. Hard spending caps are both excellent product differentiators and could possibly save these providers money as they don’t have to forgive their users when they accidentally over-use a service.
bpodgursky · · focus · HN ↗
"Sorry, you had a hard cap on AWS spend so we deleted all your S3 data on August 27th". Yeah not going to fly.
csande17 · · focus · HN ↗
To prevent cases where users can upload an excessive amount of data on March 31 that they then can't afford the April bill for, AWS should also maintain a "next month's balance" limit that gets handled in the same way.
It would take a bit more work to correctly handle things like ephemeral data and tiered storage classes, but it's not insurmountable.
You could apply the same kind of billing to most other long-lived resources, including VMs that run business-critical services.