We're going to need default hard budget caps on pretty much everything
Thread
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
We're going to need default hard budget caps on pretty much everything
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
joshdavham · · focus · HN ↗
Also, does anyone know why it’s taken this long? I suspect it’s a technical reason. While one could be cynical, I doubt it’s an intentional business/product decision. Hard spending caps are both excellent product differentiators and could possibly save these providers money as they don’t have to forgive their users when they accidentally over-use a service.
Anon1096 · · focus · HN ↗
The product level decision is that "shut down everything" is something the customers you want to target don't actually want. Are we including deleting RDS data? S3? Glacier storage? If so then the headline will just change from "Hobbyist got charged XXXXXX on AWS" to "Business literally had all their data deleted because a hacker took over their VM and mined bitcoin". The only people who really want this are hobbyists and it's not a market segment that's worth chasing. Easier to do the status quo of forgive afterwards then even open the can of worms of deleting all of a business's data and all their backups just because they had a 100k overrun.
miki123211 · · focus · HN ↗
Joker_vD · · focus · HN ↗