Thread

1. duhhhhh1212 · 1791069439 · focus · HN ↗

   <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.pangram.com&#x2F;history&#x2F;9beb9917-9686-4679-ac4d-51827ba8fdd0?ucc=t8c6BkzVOh8" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.pangram.com&#x2F;history&#x2F;9beb9917-9686-4679-ac4d-5182...

   Don’t waste your time.

   I hope these hyperbolic takes can be over, forever.

   1. duhhhhh1212 · 1791070183 · focus · HN ↗

      [dead]

      1. stackghost · 1791073426 · focus · HN ↗

         &gt; I wonder if the author also agrees with DHH’s racist opinions.

         Suppose you hold viewpoint A, and so does DHH. Suppose further you have no idea who DHH is. I, for example, had never heard of him before 2024.

         Suppose now that you discover DHH also has racist opinions.

         By the sentiment you express in your comment, logic demands that you now change your preexisting viewpoint A because it’s now shared with a racist. Is that what you’re advocating?

         1. duhhhhh1212 · 1791075086 · focus · HN ↗

            Suppose we lived in a world where clowns like DHH don’t have influence and are recognized as clowns. What a wonderful world that would be.

            At this point, our entire community knows about his racist views so why promote his racist ass further.

            1. cindyllm · 1791075173 · focus · HN ↗

               [dead]

            2. stackghost · 1791088591 · focus · HN ↗

               I note without surprise you did not answer my question

               1. duhhhhh1212 · 1791099270 · focus · HN ↗

                  Read it again and see if you can imply the the answer from my response.

                  1. stackghost · 1791131285 · focus · HN ↗

                     How about you just answer instead of being cute?

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.