‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

OpenAI safety leader quits, warning AI company's culture is 'broken'

267 points · 3 comments · jethronethro

  1. vjvjvjvjghv · · focus · HN ↗
    [delayed]
    1. kolinko · · focus · HN ↗
      Nothing is ever 100% safe, it’s about a right balance of safety to the benefit.

      Or, in other words - we have two P(Doom), one for AI being developed, and another for AI being not developed. The latter is not discussed enough imho.

      1. estearum · · focus · HN ↗
        We have P(Doom) also for "kolinko not wiring me a million dollars today" and that is not being discussed enough either imho.

        What on earth are you talking about?

        1. ViscountPenguin · · focus · HN ↗
          P(doom) for not making an ASI is pretty well established, I'm not really sure why everyone in the 21st century seems to have completely forgotten the risk of nuclear war (as the single largest example).
          1. didibus · · focus · HN ↗
            That's just another P(doom), or does making an ASI somehow negate the risk of nuclear war? Cause I'd assume it actually increases it.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.