‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Federal judge calls Flock 'indiscriminate mass surveillance'

483 points · 267 comments · sbulaev

  1. joshheitzman · · focus · HN ↗
    Yes, that's what they are. But does that mean are they breaking federal law or unconstitutional? I believe we've been told by the courts repeatedly that we should have no expectation of privacy out in public.
    1. iAMkenough · · focus · HN ↗
      If indiscriminate mass surveillance is legal, should it continue to be?

      What is America's history with tyranny?

      1. timschmidt · · focus · HN ↗
        Same as everyone else's: bad when they do it to us, good when we do it to them.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.