Thread

Surely you have ultra-wideband radios on your bins too?

147 points · 81 comments · simonjgreen

knotimpressed · 1791072741 · focus · HN ↗
How much of this was written with/edited by an LLM? Some parts of it feel somewhat Claude-ish, and I’m very curious if that’s a false positive.
Super cool work! I had no idea UWB tags had gotten so cheap, or that CR2077 was a size.
1. massagedpelican · 1791078441 · focus · HN ↗
  Over half, apparently. <a href="https://www.salahadawi.com/hacker-news-ai-detector/49947472" rel="nofollow">https://www.salahadawi.com/hacker-news-ai-detector/49947472
  1. simonjgreen · 1791097248 · focus · HN ↗
    Well that’s fascinating. The answer is a small amount was Claude written, like one of the image captions when I had it find the render and insert it, and I had it do a brief grammar and spelling check, but very little. Most of those chunks that tool has flagged were 100% handwritten.
    simonjgreen · 1791114243 · focus · HN ↗
    s/claude/codex
    dang · 1791142073 · focus · HN ↗
    FWIW, we've been finding that tools like grammar checkers far more imprints on text than people intend when they use them (<a href="https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&query=by%3Adang%20grammar%20checker&sort=byDate&type=comment" rel="nofollow">https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...). It is one of the two most common reasons why text gets classified as genai even when the author didn't use tools to generate their text. (The other is automatic translators.)

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.