‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Treachery in the Rodin Museum 3D scan verdict

325 points · 192 comments · CosmoWenman

  1. DoctorOetker · · focus · HN ↗
    People always get upset when I propose mathematical formalization of law and using e.g. metamath verifier as a judge.

    At least the metamath verifiers will not bend over backwards and come up with absurd inconsistent counterarguments.

    It's the most humiliating thing for citizens when the legal cadre of a nation pretends in the national journal that everybody falls for its lies... openly mocking the concept of truth itself with absurdism.

    1. MisterMunchkin · · focus · HN ↗
      Nobody gets upset, they just think you’re silly. Law simplification is just a classic time waste discussion. But I’ll waste 30 seconds on it for you.

      Consider a simple crime, murder. Let’s simplify it to “if you kill someone, that’s murder and you get life”

      But then what if I’m being stabbed by the person I kill?

      Okay so self defence.

      But then what if I say it’s self defence but factually that’s incorrect, but I genuinely believed it was self defence?

      What if I’m a soldier and I’m shooting an enemy?

      What if I shoot them because they’re raping my child?

      What if I’m shooting them because they raped my child ten years ago and I’ve been plotting my revenge ever since?

      What if someone said they’ll shoot me if I didn’t shoot them?

      What if I was in psychosis and thought they were going to kill me?

      What if I thought they were a deer and shot them by mistake while hunting?

      It turns out we have all these laws in this particular way because of thousands of years of work dealing with all of these issues.

      1. p-e-w · · focus · HN ↗
        Other than genuine self defense, I disagree with every single “justification” you listed. So yes, in my eyes (and the eyes of many other people I expect), the law could be substantially simplified.
        1. 2muchcoffeeman · · focus · HN ↗
          Did the post actually justify anything? Reads like a list of things that make simplification of laws hard.

          And if you can’t sympathise with any of those cases, I hope you’re never called upon to decide anything involving other people.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.