‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Pop!_OS bans AI-generated code from much of its codebase

116 points · 167 comments · bundie

  1. lkramer · · focus · HN ↗
    I had a PR in flight that got closed because of this. I had an issue with passwords in the network applet for the VPN and had used Claude to help me identify and then come up with a fix. I did spend a lot time handcrafting and making sure the quality was good, but I respect their decision and no hard feelings, but as someone who have struggled to find time and opportunity to contribute to open source it was a small set back.
    1. sedan_baklazhan · · focus · HN ↗
      What is actually the meaning of “handcrafting” here?
      1. throwaway74628 · · focus · HN ↗
        My guess: taking personal responsibility for the functionality, readability, and sanity of the change proposed, both atomically and in the context of the wider code base (adhering to existing conventions and patterns), to the best of the author’s ability.
        1. thereisno · · focus · HN ↗
          "taking responsibility" doesn't actually mean anything, it's just empty words
          1. throwaway74628 · · focus · HN ↗
            We are not the same.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.