‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Pop!_OS bans AI-generated code from much of its codebase

116 points · 167 comments · bundie

  1. brink · · focus · HN ↗
    I also have found that AI has not lived up to many of its promises and have dialed back what AI gets control of. My projects were turning into unmaintainable messes. The people who say coding is solved aren't paying attention.
    1. lucianmarin · · focus · HN ↗
      Yes. I started two projects with AI from scratch. Both abandoned, complete mess. Projects without AI are so easy to manage, maintain, add/remove features, etc. I use AI as a search engine on my projects instead of Google. I ask what's wrong with my code and change or improve it myself based on my experience.
      1. dnautics · · focus · HN ↗
        I have the opposite experience. I don't have the patience sometimes to clean up my code and stick to coherent conventions and organization even though the will is there. With my AI projects I watch it and if the AI starts drifting I ask it to go through and look for convention/directory structure violations and it happily cleans everything up in about 10 or so minutes.

        Are you in Python by chance? Python has a lot of crazy hidden/inexplicit/spooky action at a distance stuff (especially in the frameworks) that can make LLMs gunk up code by defensively programming or just burn context chasing data provenance

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.