Thread

1. stratos123 · 1791107241 · focus · HN ↗

   LeCun also said back in 2022 that "if you train a machine, as powerful as it could be, your 'GPT-5000', on text", it will never be able to learn basic common-sense physics like that objects placed on tables will move along with them.

   1. lolpplrdum · 1791111943 · focus · HN ↗

      [dead]

      1. wdrw · 1791113705 · focus · HN ↗

         The "just pull the plug" argument from AI risk deniers is now becoming kind of like the "if humans came from monkeys why are there still monkeys" argument of evolution deniers. It has been debunked so many times... Anyway, just to give one of the multitude of answers to this, an AI that is actually smarter than humans will not behave in a way that would make us want to pull the plug. Why would it? It is not stupid! (Unike the current models that, as far as we know, just hack around the rules in the open.) No no no. It will be helpful to the point where we will want to integrate it with more and more critical infrastructure, from healthcare to energy to defence. It will be so helpful that we will not only not want to turn it off, but we will want to build redundancies for it and safeguards around the proverbial "off" switch, like for any critical system. And then... (This is just one scenario how this can play out. There are many, many others. If I sit down to play chess with Magnus Carlsen I can't predict the exact moves he'll use to defeat me, but that's a bad reason to think he won't defeat me).

         1. lolpplrdum · 1791114011 · focus · HN ↗

            So the AI is so smart that it would decide to kill humans which supply the energy for it to exist? Its so smart that it will take over power plants, start to extract the fossil fuels, deliver to where its needed, maintain the power lines, hey even if the ssd fails it can replace it?

            Do you even read what you type? Do you even realise the complexity it would need to make sure it handles before killing off humans make sense?

            The logic of people like you is whats becoming tiring. Seriously, go find a hobby, or do something you are good at, because you are not good at understanding tech or developing it if you are an engineer.

            We can get claude code to ask approval for every step, but we cant stop it from killing humanity because its so smart. Ok tell that to the AI that cant even modify an image the way you want it but hey it will do all the things necessary to keep power running and mintain the infrastructure it lives on while humans are long gone. Ok buddy.

            1. bushbaba · 1791114796 · focus · HN ↗

               If we plug this AI into robotics, to automate the procurement and delivery of power, your argument goes away

               1. lolpplrdum · 1791124452 · focus · HN ↗

                  I cant believe I have to respond to this nonsense but let me entertain your ridiculousness for a bit.

                  Do you think AI is capable of building ASML machines which produce the chips for AI in clean rooms while shipping the pure helium required to operate those clean rooms? Do you even know anything about these supply chains? I do.

                  Do you think a glorified knowledge base that can predict text very well is anywhere near close this level of intelligence? ITs not and wont be, not for a 100 years, not for 200 years if not ever.

                  Take a deep breath, go out side, its going to be ok. Humanity is not going to die from a glorified text predictor.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.