Thread

1. edot · 1791067681 · focus · HN ↗

   Absolutely based. Finally someone of stature in the industry calling this whole fear overblown. Bill Gates sounded like a nontechnical goofball in his Ezra Klein interview where he basically just screamed that the Terminator is real.

   There are lots of real worries (government use to suppress the people with minimal manpower or popular support, brainrot and fake news, unemployment due to the belief that LLMs can replace people, education collapse, etc.) we should instead be looking at. This whole rogue AI shtick is tiresome.

   1. Barrin92 · 1791070504 · focus · HN ↗

      >Bill Gates sounded like a nontechnical goofball in his Ezra Klein interview where he basically just screamed that the Terminator is real.

      I saw that episode too and he genuinely looked completely out of it, even in terms of his temperament and how he was coming at Klein for putting common questions in front of him, some people are genuinely starting to lose it.

      I also found the whole debate about cyber-security and 'rogue' software so bizarre because dangerous malware isn't a new thing, and it's often dangerous not because it's intelligent but just the opposite, because it's tiny, viral and fast. Which describes everything that kills humanity in far larger numbers than anything complex, big and intelligent

      1. jswelker · 1791071216 · focus · HN ↗

         Wasn't Bill Gates mostly just saying terrorists could use AI to build a bioweapon? That sounds legit to me.

         1. nradov · 1791072195 · focus · HN ↗

            It only sounds legit to people who don't understand biology and haven't done advanced laboratory work. Sort of like Michael Crichton novels: superficially plausible but not grounded in any real science.

            1. jswelker · 1791072713 · focus · HN ↗

               I see no actual argument here.

               1. nradov · 1791074479 · focus · HN ↗

                  You haven't made any argument either, so I suppose we're even.

                  1. jswelker · 1791075415 · focus · HN ↗

                     My argument was that it is reasonable to be concerned that human terrorists might use AI to assist with building bioweapons.

                     1. nradov · 1791075802 · focus · HN ↗

                        That's merely an assertion unsupported by any reliable evidence, not an actual argument. In short you're just making shit up.

                        1. jswelker · 1791078399 · focus · HN ↗

                           Well that's the nature of trying to prevent a thing that hasn't happened yet right? What would be reliable evidence except that terrorists already used AI to help build a bioweapon? I'm sure before 9/11 talking about terrorists using commercial airplanes as makeshift missiles seemed like scaremongering too.

                           I see zero technical reasons why it could not be done, so being concerned about prevention seems pretty reasonable. I'm not saying AI uses robotic arms to build a bioweapon unassisted or something, just that it dramatically empowers bad actors enough to make them capable of things they previously were not.

                           1. pixl97 · 1791134102 · focus · HN ↗

                              The last few years have shown me something about human behavior.

                              Before the thing happens: "This will never happen, it can't happen, you're making it up, stop being a scaremonger".

                              10 minute after the thing happens: "Of course, this always happened and it's always been this way and we just have to live with it".

                              We are quickly adaptable, but that may be risky if we snuggle up with death.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.