LeCun has "zero concerns" about AI wiping out humanity, recent "rogue" incidents
Thread
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
LeCun has "zero concerns" about AI wiping out humanity, recent "rogue" incidents
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
wewewedxfgdf · · focus · HN ↗
It's ridiculous - anyone who thinks about it for a minute or two will realize that its utterly impossible.
Ordinary people/politicians don't understand AI so they turn off their rational mind and assume there is something super incredible some magical powers that they cannot understand that can destroy all humans.
Even humans - the real risk to humanity - could not destroy all humans even if they tried. There is no plausible scenario.
Even climate change and nuclear war and bio weapons - the most damaging mechanisms - would still only get some percentage of the people on earth.
And if we are talking about Skynet and self replicating robots and Terminators - please, grow up.
bch · · focus · HN ↗
Many, many people are slipping through social welfare cracks and suffering as we speak because the cost of fuel is rising[0] and we’re ostensibly helping one another and living-well. People are not durable, and not adaptive in the face of threats to “substrate” that we’ve mostly taken for granted. We are paying (in the small, in the scope of humanity) for tolls that we’ve rung up. Just less than 4000 people in Europe died[1] because the temperature ticked up a few degrees[2]. Does that make you think we’re actually robust? What happens if our at-risk electrical grid gets shut down deliberately? If communication infrastructure is adversely affected?
> Even humans - the real risk to humanity
Because, on the whole, we’re in a manageable world with reasonable people keeping the peace.
> Even climate change and nuclear war and bio weapons - the most damaging mechanisms - would still only get some percentage of the people on earth.
Is that victory? I don’t think it’s an asteroid-class event like you seem to be leaning on, but potential threats to energy, be it electrical grid, fuel production (moving goods around the world is critical - you’re not going get a plot of dirt and garden your way out of grocery stores being empty - which many got to get a taste of during the COVID pandemic) or communication. We actually fare poorly in the face of pressure there, and I’m not bullish on humanity “pulling together” like Independence Day[3] versus forming tribes and tearing each other down.
All this is predicated on a malicious AI taking over (e.g.) the electrical grid or conms, and I understand the problems with (e.g.) OpenAI/Hugging Face incident, or the overblown Mythos claims[4] (and how under some scrutiny these events shine lights on incompetence or hyperbole), but is there a trajectory/future where these systems (electrical, comms) are genuinely under threat? Do you think we’ll respond better than I described when we’re less comfortable, less in control? We’re in a tizzy over social media and it’s detrimental effects on society and it’s essentially an opt-in entertainment platform…
[0] <a href="https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/bessent-said-the-k-shaped-economy-is-over-heres-what-financial-experts-say" rel="nofollow">https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/bessent-said-the-k-shap...
[1] <a href="https://www.dw.com/en/heat-wave-european-countries-report-3700-excess-deaths/a-77823303" rel="nofollow">https://www.dw.com/en/heat-wave-european-countries-report-37...
[2] I’m not trying to diminish this - and it took a lot of “work” (environmental abuse) to arrive here - but (say) 10 degree rise in temperature sounds a lot less dramatic than thermonuclear war… but here we are, with 3,700 deaths.
[3] <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independence_Day_(1996_film)" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independence_Day_(1996_film)
[4] <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49929391">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49929391