"AGI" says nothing about how intelligent a system is, only that its intelligence it does have is generally applicable.
There are different usages, but this is not one I've heard before. If there is no floor to intelligence then this criteria was met with GPT 2.
I suppose you're pointing out that pre-RL models were less jagged hence more general (universally dumb)?
mupuff1234 · · focus · HN ↗
Zambyte · · focus · HN ↗
jeremyjh · · focus · HN ↗
HarHarVeryFunny · · focus · HN ↗