I think its pretty easy to solve these problems: Whenever an AI agent commits a crime, the CEO is held personally accountable, as if they'd committed it themselves.
This has been litigated endlessly with guns. The ceo of Smith & Wesson is not personally responsible for what people do with their guns.
jeremyjh · · focus · HN ↗
dkasper · · focus · HN ↗
rfghy · · focus · HN ↗
[dead]